From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] block: fix concurrent quiesce
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 14:20:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <364680b4-defa-a559-f7bf-53adcbec957f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103034305.3691555-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On 11/2/21 9:43 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Convert SCSI into balanced quiesce and unquiesce by using atomic
> variable as suggested by James, meantime fix previous nvme conversion by
> adding one new API because we have to wait until the started quiesce is
> done.
>
>
> Ming Lei (4):
> blk-mq: add one API for waiting until quiesce is done
> scsi: avoid to quiesce sdev->request_queue two times
> scsi: make sure that request queue queiesce and unquiesce balanced
> nvme: wait until quiesce is done
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 28 +++++++++++++------
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 +++
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
> include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
James/Martin, are you find with the SCSI side? Would make queueing this
up easier...
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-07 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 3:43 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix concurrent quiesce Ming Lei
2021-11-03 3:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: add one API for waiting until quiesce is done Ming Lei
2021-11-03 3:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: avoid to quiesce sdev->request_queue two times Ming Lei
2021-11-03 3:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: make sure that request queue queiesce and unquiesce balanced Ming Lei
2021-11-08 16:42 ` James Bottomley
2021-11-09 0:44 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-09 3:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-09 3:22 ` James Bottomley
2021-11-03 3:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: wait until quiesce is done Ming Lei
2021-11-08 16:45 ` Keith Busch
2021-11-12 15:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-07 21:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=364680b4-defa-a559-f7bf-53adcbec957f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox