Re: [PATCH] floppy: fix reference leak on platform_device_register() failure

["Denis Efremov (Oracle)" <efremov@linux.com>]

On 15/04/2026 17:54, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> Hi Denis,
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> 
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 at 21:00, Denis Efremov (Oracle) <efremov@linux.com> wrote:
>>
>> 1. Let's use platform_device_put()
>>
>>>                       goto out_remove_drives;
>>> +             }
>>>
>>>               registered[drive] = true;
>>>
> 
> My understanding is:
> 
> For the platform_device_register() failure case, we should use
> platform_device_put() instead of put_device(), so the failure path
> would look like:
> 
> err = platform_device_register(&floppy_device[drive]);
> if (err) {
>         platform_device_put(&floppy_device[drive]);
>         goto out_remove_drives;
> }
> registered[drive] = true;

Yes, correct.

> 
>>                 err = device_add_disk(&floppy_device[drive].dev,
>>                                       disks[drive][0], NULL);
>>                 if (err)
>>                         goto out_remove_drives;
>>
>> 2. We also need to fix this case.
>>
>> platform_device_unregister()
>> registered[drive] = false;
>> goto ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Denis
> We also need to handle the device_add_disk() failure case for the
> current drive, since out_remove_drives only cleans up previously
> registered drives. So this path should explicitly unregister the
> current platform device before jumping to the common cleanup path, for
> example:
> 
> err = device_add_disk(&floppy_device[drive].dev, disks[drive][0], NULL);
> if (err) {
>         platform_device_unregister(&floppy_device[drive]);
>         registered[drive] = false;
>         goto out_remove_drives;
> }
> 
> 
> Is my understanding correct? If so, I will prepare and send a v2
> following this pattern.

Yes, correct. Please, send v2.

> 
> Thanks,
> Guangshuo