From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: convert scsi_result_to_blk_status() to inline
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:12:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a59df5-9fdb-a1f1-39a2-c41b62e8076c@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb30875e11913a33bcaf491d0f752132ebb9ce5e.camel@suse.com>
On 4/29/21 1:33 PM, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 09:20 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 4/29/21 8:50 AM, mwilck@suse.com wrote:
>>> This makes it possible to use scsi_result_to_blk_status() from
>>> code that shouldn't depend on scsi_mod (e.g. device mapper).
>>
>> I think that's the wrong reason to make a function inline. Please
>> consider moving scsi_result_to_blk_status() into one of the block
>> layer
>> source code files that already deals with SG I/O, e.g.
>> block/scsi_ioctl.c.
>
> scsi_ioctl.c, are you certain? scsi_result_to_blk_status() is an
> important part of the block/scsi interface... You're right that that
> this function is not a prime candidate for inlining, but I'm still
> wondering where it belongs if we don't.
The block/scsi_ioctl.c file is included in the kernel if and only if
BLK_SCSI_REQUEST is enabled. And that Kconfig symbol only selects the
block/scsi_ioctl.c file. Additionally, the following occurs in the SCSI
Kconfig file:
config SCSI
tristate "SCSI device support"
[ ... ]
select BLK_SCSI_REQUEST
In other words, block/scsi_ioctl.c is built unconditionally if SCSI is
enabled. Adding the scsi_result_to_blk_status() function to the
block/scsi_ioctl.c file would increase the size of kernels that enable
bsg, ide, the SCSI target code or nfsd but not the SCSI initiator code.
If the latter is a concern, how about moving scsi_result_to_blk_status()
into a new file in the block directory?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-30 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 15:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] dm: dm_blk_ioctl(): implement failover for SG_IO on dm-multipath mwilck
2021-04-29 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: convert scsi_result_to_blk_status() to inline mwilck
2021-04-29 16:20 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2021-04-29 20:33 ` Martin Wilck
2021-04-30 21:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-04-29 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] dm: add CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH_SG_IO - failover for SG_IO on dm-multipath mwilck
2021-04-29 16:32 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2021-04-29 21:08 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39a59df5-9fdb-a1f1-39a2-c41b62e8076c@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).