From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, ak@linux.intel.com,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Return bytes transferred for partial direct I/O
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:31:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a01f3eb-3363-ab23-dbbc-dda45f4f0bf7@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98449f4d-8ab7-15e6-d3dd-f547d58177e4@infradead.org>
On 01/29/2018 01:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/29/2018 06:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>>
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
>> index 6c00c1e2743f..72e213d62511 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
>> @@ -76,6 +77,19 @@ dcache isn't pruned yet.
>>
>> ==============================================================
>>
>> +dio_short_writes:
>> +
>> +In case Direct I/O encounters an transient error, it returns
>
> a transient
>
>> +the errorcode, even if it has performed part of the write.
>
> error code,
>
>> +This flag, if on (default), will return the number of bytes written
>> +so far, as the write(2) symantics are. However, some older applications
>
> semantics
>
>> +still consider a direct write as an error if all of the I/O
>> +submitted is not complete. ie write(file, count, buf) != count.
>
> I.e.
>
>> +This option can be disabled on systems in order to support
>> +existing applications which do not expect short writes.
Thanks for the comments. I will incorporate the language changes.
>
> and if my system has a mix of older applications and new ones,
> will they all work just fine?
>
Newer applications should treat the error as nothing is written.
But yes, I tried doing it through prctl for an individual processes, but
did not find a free bit to stick it in.
--
Goldwyn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 14:57 [PATCH v6 1/2] Return bytes transferred for partial direct I/O Goldwyn Rodrigues
2018-01-29 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: remove assert to check bytes returned Goldwyn Rodrigues
2018-01-29 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-29 19:04 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Return bytes transferred for partial direct I/O Randy Dunlap
2018-01-30 17:31 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a01f3eb-3363-ab23-dbbc-dda45f4f0bf7@suse.de \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox