From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v3] nvme/046: test queue count changes on reconnect
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:37:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b58b91d-e217-86a2-b2e4-3b0656bbe0e9@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220914090003.jbc5xmtfxjjssuz3@carbon.lan>
>>>> FYI, each blktests test case can define DMESG_FILTER not to fail with specific
>>>> keywords in dmesg. Test cases meta/011 and block/028 are reference use
>>>> cases.
>>>
>>> Ah okay, let me look into it.
>>
>> So I made the state read function a bit more robust (test if state file
>> exists) and the it turns out this made rdma happy(??) but tcp is still
>> breaking.
>
> s/tcp/fc/
>
> On closer inspection I see following sequence for fc:
>
> [399664.863585] nvmet: connect request for invalid subsystem blktests-subsystem-1!
> [399664.863704] nvme nvme0: Connect Invalid Data Parameter, subsysnqn "blktests-subsystem-1"
> [399664.863758] nvme nvme0: NVME-FC{0}: reset: Reconnect attempt failed (16770)
> [399664.863784] nvme nvme0: NVME-FC{0}: reconnect failure
> [399664.863837] nvme nvme0: Removing ctrl: NQN "blktests-subsystem-1"
>
> When the host tries to reconnect to a non existing controller (the test
> called _remove_nvmet_subsystem_from_port()) the target returns 0x4182
> (NVME_SC_DNR|NVME_SC_READ_ONLY(?)).
That is not something that the target is supposed to be doing, I have no
idea why this is sent. Perhaps this is something specific to the fc
implementation?
So arguably fc behaves correct by
> stopping the reconnects. tcp and rdma just ignore the DNR.
DNR means do not retry the command, it says nothing about do not attempt
a future reconnect...
> If we agree that the fc behavior is the right one, then the nvmet code
> needs to be changed so that when the qid_max attribute changes it forces
> a reconnect. The trick with calling _remove_nvmet_subsystem_from_port()
> to force a reconnect is not working. And tcp/rdma needs to honor the
> DNR.
tcp/rdma honor DNR afaik.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 6:57 [PATCH blktests v3] nvme/046: test queue count changes on reconnect Daniel Wagner
2022-09-13 10:57 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-09-13 11:42 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-13 17:10 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-14 9:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-14 10:37 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2022-09-14 11:07 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-15 11:33 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-15 12:50 ` Daniel Wagner
2022-09-15 15:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-09-16 6:30 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b58b91d-e217-86a2-b2e4-3b0656bbe0e9@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox