From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Gabriel Ryan <gabe@cs.columbia.edu>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Race in block/blk-mq-sched.c blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:28:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f676f69-690a-480c-850d-ff1d9e502e4f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37b7836b-f231-4bf5-bee1-7571f889d6ff@acm.org>
On 1/17/24 1:22 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 1/17/24 12:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/17/24 1:16 PM, Gabriel Ryan wrote:
>>> We found a race in the block message queue for kernel v5.18-rc5 using
>>> a race testing tool we are developing. We are reporting this race
>>> because it appears to be potentially harmful. The race occurs in
>>>
>>> block/blk-mq-sched.c:333 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests
>>>
>>> hctx->run++;
>>>
>>> where multiple threads can schedule dispatch requests and increment
>>> the request counter htctx->run simultaneously. This appears to lead to
>>> undefined behavior where multiple conflicting updates to the hctx->run
>>> value could result in it not matching the number of requests that
>>> have been scheduled with calls to blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests.
>>
>> I suggest you take a closer look at how that variable is actually
>> used.
>
> It's probably a good idea to explain this in a comment above the
> code that increments hctx->runs because others may also be wondering
> what the impact is of concurrent hctx->runs increments.
If you do a quick grep, you'll very quickly see that it's just used
for debugfs output. Being racy is not a problem. It should just get
removed, honestly, like I did with some of the other accounting some
time ago.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 20:16 Race in block/blk-mq-sched.c blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests Gabriel Ryan
2024-01-17 20:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-17 20:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-01-17 20:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-01-17 20:36 ` Gabriel Ryan
2024-01-17 20:49 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f676f69-690a-480c-850d-ff1d9e502e4f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gabe@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox