From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: pci: simplify timeout handling
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 22:31:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <401cba4e-4a70-291d-54f0-5cb484006587@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180428133514.GB5938@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Ming and Keith
Let me detail extend more here. :)
On 04/28/2018 09:35 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>> Actually there isn't the case before, even for legacy path, one .timeout()
>> handles one request only.
Yes, .timeout should be invoked for every timeout request and .timeout should also
handle this only one request in principle
however, nvme_timeout will invoke nvme_dev_disable
> That's not quite what I was talking about.
>
> Before, only the command that was about to be sent to the driver's
> .timeout() was marked completed. The driver could (and did) compete
> other timed out commands in a single .timeout(), and the tag would
> clear, so we could hanlde all timeouts in a single .timeout().
I think Keith are saying that
before this new blk-mq timeout implementation, the logic of blk_mq_timeout_work is
get _only_ _one_ timeout request
mark completed
invoke .timeout, in nvme, it is nvme_timeout
then nvme_dev_disable is invoked and thus other requests could be completed by blk_mq_complete_request
because they have not been mark completed
>
> Now, blk-mq marks all timed out commands as aborted prior to calling
> the driver's .timeout(). If the driver completes any of those commands,
> the tag does not clear, so the driver's .timeout() just gets to be called
> again for commands it already reaped.
>
After the new blk-mq timeout implementation,
set the aborted_gstate of _all_ the timeout requests
invoke the .timeout one by one
for the first timeout request's .timeout, in nvme, it is nvme_timeout
nvme_dev_disable is invoked and try to complete all the in-flight requests through blk_mq_complete_request
but timeout requests that have been set aborted_gstate cannot handled by blk_mq_complete_request
so some requests are leaked by nvme_dev_disable
these residual timeout requests will still be handled by blk_mq_timeout_work through invoke .timeout one by one
Thanks
Jianchao
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-28 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 12:39 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling Ming Lei
2018-04-26 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: pci: simplify " Ming Lei
2018-04-26 15:07 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-26 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-26 16:16 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 1:37 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-27 14:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 14:00 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-28 21:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 22:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-29 1:36 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-29 2:21 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-29 14:13 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 17:51 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 3:50 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 13:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 14:31 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-04-28 21:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-30 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-30 23:14 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-08 15:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 20:52 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:10 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:18 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:24 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:44 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:50 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:53 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 22:03 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 22:43 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-11 0:14 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-11 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-26 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: pci: guarantee EH can make progress Ming Lei
2018-04-26 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 3:28 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=401cba4e-4a70-291d-54f0-5cb484006587@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox