From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764B62DC786; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757951982; cv=none; b=YPV+IzJ2THO4NwgkhS3tukg/2YvfHo9sVGQCz2ga9dHMoHV7ZeJQrTgaKhNYz0ewn7rCUQfu/LZhIlb7v10LAlJg78Yvph2dyI6GiwtzZlBIg5PmcAaSyQjxgUrZGwqj5PgzItZaUjwYCbJipEIk5u+JuKa4MxBQDLE4lAL6mp0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757951982; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nL9ggkeLKrCag013OOuf2Q3tK+5yJb8z4YPOcfsj9ow=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=opLDsGwN3L2EQMOj1bDinT9GiQJO/ZbzXXBIdpZGpE9kGKFpY3l4Qliq+Lo12CRrUgjAdmd+TPPTsY97cIX3X1mZdPI6/mMyPZrA6VrE4vKEnTu6TZCKelStsB8EMnv7OhIbJqmhI7iIpO9aDMx50dyl/cDFZWdiav6Znb8eGIg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=TGFpRk15; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="TGFpRk15" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cQV8q2SzFzm0yVd; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1757951978; x=1760543979; bh=UvimxUoZtBhyUDAYakrj8TxX dlqZ1vtiiNbu0AdWBx8=; b=TGFpRk15MH/ooGvAu2NCTZhho8GCRmFPVLcgXz4n mHz8j5iCgQTizRF7MxnzSL4Ui2L6p3l6RWjOCh/uWhgFUFf92g+GmOKPbLZE7cTl hiRDVB4wa9JB2OQjHaInKA6bqfKH4YuWCf82DLVXIwlG6atvaT5ezFoMCo22JQQ7 idrx00iBCXNs8nMVxTRHqHrAlGp7Cle6W5XCuOomWSRJHIrGaAQdQuzXJ9TRel0/ dDPcFYHT5wCrp7EqsvLdts9NXjARQdPKzvgorXcGbFTXBlSkOg9riLprBKrmhxVY T/56wqtYEw/Itnx6C6mOYlYZprqapS1VcRTywXGAnnewag== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id E7Fnayo8jkLR; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cQV8k4Q9hzm0yV6; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <41ff57c2-19d4-495b-ae51-f30e555a74b4@acm.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:59:32 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] block/mq-deadline: Replace DD_PRIO_MAX with DD_PRIO_COUNT To: chengkaitao , axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chengkaitao References: <20250915130606.97949-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20250915130606.97949-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/15/25 6:06 AM, chengkaitao wrote: > Remove redundant DD_PRIO_MAX and enum types, Move DD_PRIO_COUNT > into enum dd_prio{}, and similarly for DD_DIR_COUNT. Why has this patch been reposted? Last time it was posted I explained in detail that in my opinion all changes in this patch makes the code worse instead of better. Additionally, when a new version of a patch is posted, it should include a changelog. I don't see a changelog in this patch. Please drop this patch. Bart.