From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Martin Steigerwald , Jens Axboe , jdow , linux-m68k , linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <20180627012421.80B8F24E094@nmr-admin> <3681004.ZGfTzPZDUK@merkaba> <102c5f41-7fa8-267c-973a-176d3c3d4f57@gmail.com> <76bf5b8d-6ee1-8e77-4c2a-e0b5a095992b@gmail.com> From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <429b11a2-35e5-74b5-62f7-303436781c1b@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 21:25:01 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: Hi Geert, Am 29.06.18 um 21:12 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:08 AM Michael Schmitz wrote: >> Am 29.06.18 um 20:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: >>>> Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt >>>> to use it? >>> No idea... >>> >>> Probably some old Windows or MacOS versions will just suggest to >>> format your "new" disk ;-) >> Yep, that's what I'd expect. Windows even used to trash the LILO boot >> code in the MBR if you just happened to boot to it by accident. Did we >> complain? > Those days Linux users just knew not to use Windows ;-) For good reason. But that happened on a couple of instrument control PCs I converted from Win2k. Never mount a scratch monkey...  >>> Personally, I see no reason to depend on a kernel option, if it is safe to use. >>> Just use it. >> So to recap - someone partitions a disk on AmigaOS 4.x, taking advantage >> of the large block device support there. >> Using that disk on AmigaOS 3.1, data loss ensues. Whether or not Linux >> (patched) ever touched the disk has no impact on that outcome. >> >> Right? > That's my understanding, too. OK, that decides it. Cheers,     Michael > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >