public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	caspar@linux.alibaba.com, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: bio_check_eod() needs to consider partition
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 09:23:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <431e8dd7-1e44-2dea-8e48-4f2400e01e1e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228174809.GA18158@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,

thanks for your quick reply.

On 2018/3/1 上午1:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hmm.  I'd rather just kill off bio_check_eod and move the check
> to blk_partition_remap so that we only have to check once.
> 
I think the check should be done twice if the bi_partno is not zero,
one for the partition, and another for the whole disk after remap which
is add in the commit 5ddfe9691c91
("md: check bio address after mapping through partitions").

Thanks,
Jiufei

> What do you think of this version?  Probably needs to be split into
> one or two prep patches and the real change.
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 3ba4326a63b5..36a3cb042ca7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  }
>  
> -static void handle_bad_sector(struct bio *bio)
> +static void handle_bad_sector(struct bio *bio, sector_t maxsector)
>  {
>  	char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
>  
> @@ -2017,7 +2017,7 @@ static void handle_bad_sector(struct bio *bio)
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "%s: rw=%d, want=%Lu, limit=%Lu\n",
>  			bio_devname(bio, b), bio->bi_opf,
>  			(unsigned long long)bio_end_sector(bio),
> -			(long long)get_capacity(bio->bi_disk));
> +			(long long)maxsector);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST
> @@ -2060,57 +2060,47 @@ static inline bool should_fail_request(struct hd_struct *part,
>   */
>  static inline int blk_partition_remap(struct bio *bio)
>  {
> -	struct hd_struct *p;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	sector_t maxsector = get_capacity(bio->bi_disk);
> +	int nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Zone reset does not include bi_size so bio_sectors() is always 0.
>  	 * Include a test for the reset op code and perform the remap if needed.
>  	 */
> -	if (!bio->bi_partno ||
> -	    (!bio_sectors(bio) && bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET))
> +	if (!nr_sectors && bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	p = __disk_get_part(bio->bi_disk, bio->bi_partno);
> -	if (likely(p && !should_fail_request(p, bio->bi_iter.bi_size))) {
> +	if (bio->bi_partno) {
> +		struct hd_struct *p;
> +
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		p = __disk_get_part(bio->bi_disk, bio->bi_partno);
> +		if (unlikely(!p ||
> +			     should_fail_request(p, bio->bi_iter.bi_size))) {
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			pr_info("%s: fail for partition %d\n",
> +				__func__, bio->bi_partno);
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +
>  		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += p->start_sect;
>  		bio->bi_partno = 0;
>  		trace_block_bio_remap(bio->bi_disk->queue, bio, part_devt(p),
>  				bio->bi_iter.bi_sector - p->start_sect);
> -	} else {
> -		printk("%s: fail for partition %d\n", __func__, bio->bi_partno);
> -		ret = -EIO;
> +		maxsector = part_nr_sects_read(p);
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Check whether this bio extends beyond the end of the device.
> - */
> -static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_sectors)
> -{
> -	sector_t maxsector;
> -
> -	if (!nr_sectors)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	/* Test device or partition size, when known. */
> -	maxsector = get_capacity(bio->bi_disk);
> -	if (maxsector) {
> -		sector_t sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> -
> -		if (maxsector < nr_sectors || maxsector - nr_sectors < sector) {
> -			/*
> -			 * This may well happen - the kernel calls bread()
> -			 * without checking the size of the device, e.g., when
> -			 * mounting a device.
> -			 */
> -			handle_bad_sector(bio);
> -			return 1;
> -		}
> +	/*
> +	 * Check whether this bio extends beyond the end of the device or
> +	 * partition.  This may well happen - the kernel calls bread() without
> +	 * checking the size of the device, e.g., when mounting a file system.
> +	 */
> +	if (nr_sectors && maxsector &&
> +	    (nr_sectors > maxsector ||
> +	     bio->bi_iter.bi_sector > maxsector - nr_sectors)) {
> +		handle_bad_sector(bio, maxsector);
> +		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -2126,9 +2116,6 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
>  
>  	might_sleep();
>  
> -	if (bio_check_eod(bio, nr_sectors))
> -		goto end_io;
> -
>  	q = bio->bi_disk->queue;
>  	if (unlikely(!q)) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -2152,9 +2139,6 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
>  	if (blk_partition_remap(bio))
>  		goto end_io;
>  
> -	if (bio_check_eod(bio, nr_sectors))
> -		goto end_io;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Filter flush bio's early so that make_request based
>  	 * drivers without flush support don't have to worry
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-01  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27 12:07 [PATCH V2 0/4] fix a few problems in block layer Jiufei Xue
2018-02-27 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: fix the count of PGPGOUT for WRITE_SAME Jiufei Xue
2018-02-27 12:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: display the correct diskname for bio Jiufei Xue
2018-02-28 17:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-27 12:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: fix a typo Jiufei Xue
2018-02-28 17:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-27 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: bio_check_eod() needs to consider partition Jiufei Xue
2018-02-28 17:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-01  1:23     ` Jiufei Xue [this message]
2018-03-08  7:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-01 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] fix a few problems in block layer Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-26 12:01 [PATCH " Jiufei Xue
2018-02-26 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: bio_check_eod() needs to consider partition Jiufei Xue
2018-02-26 21:03   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-02-27  0:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-27  4:51     ` Jiufei Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=431e8dd7-1e44-2dea-8e48-4f2400e01e1e@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=caspar@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox