From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Martin Steigerwald To: Michael Schmitz Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Jens Axboe , jdow , linux-m68k , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:10:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4338391.UcfQxFzGmz@merkaba> In-Reply-To: <102c5f41-7fa8-267c-973a-176d3c3d4f57@gmail.com> References: <20180627012421.80B8F24E094@nmr-admin> <102c5f41-7fa8-267c-973a-176d3c3d4f57@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: Hi Michael. Michael Schmitz - 29.06.18, 10:42: > Am 28.06.18 um 21:25 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > >>> Do we really need the warning? > >>> Once the parsing is fixed doing 64-bit math, it does not matter > >>> for > >>> Linux anymore. > >> > >> Well, irony of this is: In my case the RDB has been created on a > >> machine with a native OS. So Linux warns me about something I > >> already did so on the native OS without any warning. In this case > >> AmigaOS 4.0.> > > Exactly. > > > > So moving a disk partitioned under AmigaOS 4.0 to a system running > > an > > older version of AmigaOS can fail miserably. Not a Linux issue. > > Linux also doesn't warn about disks with GPT failing to work on old > > MSDOS. > Would MSDOS recognize the GPT partition as 'probably FAT', and attempt > to use it? As far as I know most GPT partitioning tools create a fake MBR with one large partition of a partition type for GPT to tell legacy applications to leave the disk alone. Thanks, -- Martin