linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@sandisk.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12 v5] Multiqueue for MMC/SD
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:17:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44451616.XazKDfAUO2@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110100143.12256-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3059 bytes --]


Hi Linus,

On Friday, November 10, 2017 11:01:31 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> This is the fifth iteration of this patch set.
> 
> I *HOPE* that we can scrap this patch set and merge Adrian's
> patches instead, because they also bring CQE support which is
> nice. I had some review comments on his series, mainly that
> it needs to kill off the legacy block layer code path that
> noone likes anyway.
> 
> So this is mainly an academic and inspirational exercise.
> Whatever remains of this refactoring, if anything, I can
> certainly do on top of Adrian's patches as well.
> 
> What changed since v4 is the error path, since Adrian pointed
> out that the error handling seems to be fragile. It was indeed
> fragile... To make sure things work properly I have run long
> test rounds with fault injection, essentially:
> 
> Enable FAULT_INJECTION, FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS,
>        FAIL_MMC_REQUEST
> cd /debug/mmc3/fail_mmc_request/
> echo 1 > probability
> echo -1 > times
> 
> Then running a dd to the card, also increased the error rate
> to 10% and completed tests successfully, but at this error
> rate the MMC stack sometimes exceeds the retry limit and the
> dd command fails (as is appropriate).
> 
> Removing a card during I/O does not work well however :/
> So I guess I would need to work on that if this series should
> continue. (Hopefully unlikely.)
> 
> 
> Linus Walleij (12):
>   mmc: core: move the asynchronous post-processing
>   mmc: core: add a workqueue for completing requests
>   mmc: core: replace waitqueue with worker
>   mmc: core: do away with is_done_rcv
>   mmc: core: do away with is_new_req
>   mmc: core: kill off the context info
>   mmc: queue: simplify queue logic
>   mmc: block: shuffle retry and error handling
>   mmc: queue: stop flushing the pipeline with NULL
>   mmc: queue/block: pass around struct mmc_queue_req*s
>   mmc: block: issue requests in massive parallel
>   mmc: switch MMC/SD to use blk-mq multiqueueing v5
> 
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.c    | 557 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.h    |   5 +-
>  drivers/mmc/core/bus.c      |   1 -
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c     | 217 ++++++++++-------
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.h     |  11 +-
>  drivers/mmc/core/host.c     |   1 -
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_test.c |  31 +--
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.c    | 252 ++++++++------------
>  drivers/mmc/core/queue.h    |  16 +-
>  include/linux/mmc/core.h    |   3 +-
>  include/linux/mmc/host.h    |  31 +--
>  11 files changed, 557 insertions(+), 568 deletions(-)

This works much better than initial version and a simple dd read
test shows more consistent results than with vanilla kernel.

However there are still some issues:

1. 30 seconds delay on "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated..."
   during boot

2. reboot command no longer works (there is a livelock after
   "The system is going down for reboot NOW!" message)

Full log (together with SysRq-l & SysRq-t outputs) attached.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

[-- Attachment #2: log.txt.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 53535 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-14 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20171110104657epcas1p278e62237982d200175480c28080cb708@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-11-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 00/12 v5] Multiqueue for MMC/SD Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 01/12 v5] mmc: core: move the asynchronous post-processing Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 02/12 v5] mmc: core: add a workqueue for completing requests Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 03/12 v5] mmc: core: replace waitqueue with worker Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 04/12] mmc: core: do away with is_done_rcv Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 05/12] mmc: core: do away with is_new_req Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 06/12 v5] mmc: core: kill off the context info Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 07/12 v5] mmc: queue: simplify queue logic Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 08/12 v5] mmc: block: shuffle retry and error handling Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 09/12 v5] mmc: queue: stop flushing the pipeline with NULL Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 10/12 v5] mmc: queue/block: pass around struct mmc_queue_req*s Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 11/12 v5] mmc: block: issue requests in massive parallel Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 10:01   ` [PATCH 12/12 v5] mmc: switch MMC/SD to use blk-mq multiqueueing v5 Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 13:39   ` [PATCH 00/12 v5] Multiqueue for MMC/SD Linus Walleij
2017-11-10 15:24   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-11-14 21:17     ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-15 10:24       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-11-15 13:50       ` Adrian Hunter
2017-11-29 13:13         ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-14 12:17   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2017-11-14 13:30     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-11-14 21:19       ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44451616.XazKDfAUO2@amdc3058 \
    --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=Avri.Altman@sandisk.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).