From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sbates@raithlin.com>
Message-ID: <466066478645ecdc414e0d5de4178c41.squirrel@webmail.raithlin.com>
In-Reply-To: <43b42605-0c97-ca33-2e39-5ec58b441bcc@kernel.dk>
References: <20170111134312.GH6286@linux-x5ow.site>
    <cc00cc1f-17d7-105e-ef2c-61791b7cc676@kernel.dk>
    <43b3038b57ed5c00a73ebc5457d048d5.squirrel@webmail.raithlin.com>
    <43b42605-0c97-ca33-2e39-5ec58b441bcc@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:56:12 -0600
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
From: "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com>
To: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Johannes Thumshirn" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
 "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" <lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
 "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
 "Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
 linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
 "Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
List-ID: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>

>
> This is a separate topic. The initial proposal is for polling for
> interrupt mitigation, you are talking about polling in the context of
> polling for completion of an IO.
>
> We can definitely talk about this form of polling as well, but it should
> be a separate topic and probably proposed independently.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>

Jens

Oh thanks for the clarification. I will propose this as a separate topic.

Thanks

Stephen