linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:43:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476C2322-BD02-4631-9588-E182847F9EC6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e4e1f5a-30fd-430b-99ec-8b1004d8e3fd@kernel.dk>



> On Sep 10, 2024, at 21:17, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
> On 9/3/24 2:16 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
>> Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver.
>> 
>> CPU0                                    CPU1                                    CPU2
>> 
>> blk_mq_try_issue_directly()
>>    __blk_mq_issue_directly()
>>        q->mq_ops->queue_rq()
>>            virtio_queue_rq()
>>                blk_mq_stop_hw_queue()
>>                                        blk_mq_try_issue_directly()             virtblk_done()
>>                                            if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped())
>>    blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()                                                  blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queue()
>>    blk_mq_run_hw_queue()                                                               blk_mq_run_hw_queue()
>>                                                blk_mq_insert_request()
>>                                                return // Who is responsible for dispatching this IO request?
>> 
>> After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped.
>> But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt
>> of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue
>> as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1
>> and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same
>> hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running
>> the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle
>> a similar situation. Fix it as well.
> 
> Patch looks fine, but this commit message is waaaaay too wide. Please
> limit it to 72-74 chars. The above ordering is diagram is going to
> otherwise be unreadable in a git log viewing in a terminal.

Thanks for your reply. I'll adjust those lines to make the digram more
readable.

Muchun,
Thanks.

> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-11  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-03  8:16 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some starvation problems in block layer Muchun Song
2024-09-03  8:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: fix missing dispatching request when queue is started or unquiesced Muchun Song
2024-09-10 13:17   ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-11  2:43     ` Muchun Song [this message]
2024-09-03  8:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: fix ordering between checking QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED and adding requests Muchun Song
2024-09-04 12:56   ` Ming Lei
2024-09-10 13:22   ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-11  3:54     ` Ming Lei
2024-09-11  3:59       ` Muchun Song
2024-09-11  5:20         ` Muchun Song
2024-09-12  3:27       ` Muchun Song
2024-09-12  6:27         ` Muchun Song
2024-09-11  3:56     ` Muchun Song
2024-09-03  8:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: fix ordering between checking BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED " Muchun Song
2024-09-04 13:04   ` Ming Lei
2024-09-10 13:22   ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-11  2:44     ` Muchun Song
2024-09-10  2:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix some starvation problems in block layer Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476C2322-BD02-4631-9588-E182847F9EC6@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).