linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block)
       [not found] <cki.1EF86A56CB.4YRW9Z76J1@redhat.com>
@ 2020-11-04 20:12 ` Veronika Kabatova
  2020-11-04 20:54   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Veronika Kabatova @ 2020-11-04 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe; +Cc: linux-block



----- Original Message -----
> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 9:07:37 PM
> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block)
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo:
>        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
>             Commit: 31823cc0ea9c - Merge branch 'for-5.11/io_uring' into
>             for-next
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/11/04/616937
> 
> We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the
> compile
> failed on one or more architectures:
> 
>            ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
> 

Hi,

on the first look this seems to be introduced by

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=23209e3dc23c8422e670472ebdd1cc349879a64c


For convenience here's a direct error from the logs:

00:02:10 In file included from fs/io_uring.c:45:
00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:238:18: error: conflicting types for ‘sys_io_uring_enter’
00:02:10   238 |  asmlinkage long sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)) \
00:02:10       |                  ^~~
00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:224:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__SYSCALL_DEFINEx’
00:02:10   224 |  __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
00:02:10       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:218:36: note: in expansion of macro ‘SYSCALL_DEFINEx’
00:02:10   218 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE6(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(6, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
00:02:10       |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:02:10 fs/io_uring.c:9135:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘SYSCALL_DEFINE6’
00:02:10  9135 | SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
00:02:10       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:318:17: note: previous declaration of ‘sys_io_uring_enter’ was here
00:02:10   318 | asmlinkage long sys_io_uring_enter(unsigned int fd, u32 to_submit,
00:02:10       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
00:02:10 make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: fs/io_uring.o] Error 1
00:02:10 make[2]: *** [Makefile:1799: fs] Error 2


Veronika


> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this
> message.
> 
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more
> effective.
> 
>         ,-.   ,-.
>        ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
>         `-',-.`-'   Kernel
>           ( I )     Integration
>            `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Compile testing
> ---------------
> 
> We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
> 
>     aarch64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     ppc64le:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     s390x:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
>     x86_64:
>       make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block)
  2020-11-04 20:12 ` ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block) Veronika Kabatova
@ 2020-11-04 20:54   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-11-04 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Veronika Kabatova; +Cc: linux-block

On 11/4/20 1:12 PM, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
>> To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 9:07:37 PM
>> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block)
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>
>>        Kernel repo:
>>        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
>>             Commit: 31823cc0ea9c - Merge branch 'for-5.11/io_uring' into
>>             for-next
>>
>> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>
>>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>              Merge: OK
>>            Compile: FAILED
>>
>> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>
>>   https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2020/11/04/616937
>>
>> We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the
>> compile
>> failed on one or more architectures:
>>
>>            ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> on the first look this seems to be introduced by
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=23209e3dc23c8422e670472ebdd1cc349879a64c
> 
> 
> For convenience here's a direct error from the logs:
> 
> 00:02:10 In file included from fs/io_uring.c:45:
> 00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:238:18: error: conflicting types for ‘sys_io_uring_enter’
> 00:02:10   238 |  asmlinkage long sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)) \
> 00:02:10       |                  ^~~
> 00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:224:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__SYSCALL_DEFINEx’
> 00:02:10   224 |  __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
> 00:02:10       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:218:36: note: in expansion of macro ‘SYSCALL_DEFINEx’
> 00:02:10   218 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE6(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(6, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
> 00:02:10       |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 00:02:10 fs/io_uring.c:9135:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘SYSCALL_DEFINE6’
> 00:02:10  9135 | SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
> 00:02:10       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 00:02:10 ./include/linux/syscalls.h:318:17: note: previous declaration of ‘sys_io_uring_enter’ was here
> 00:02:10   318 | asmlinkage long sys_io_uring_enter(unsigned int fd, u32 to_submit,
> 00:02:10       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 00:02:10 make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: fs/io_uring.o] Error 1
> 00:02:10 make[2]: *** [Makefile:1799: fs] Error 2

Yeah, the patch didn't modify the syscalls.h header... I'll get that fixed up,
thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-04 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <cki.1EF86A56CB.4YRW9Z76J1@redhat.com>
2020-11-04 20:12 ` ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.10.0-rc2 (block) Veronika Kabatova
2020-11-04 20:54   ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).