public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: use a per disk workqueue for zone write plugging
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:01:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b3a868a-3c79-42cd-96bb-3bf288ee786b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiYC6c100oNWFa0y@infradead.org>

On 2024/04/22 16:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 04:58:11PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> A zone write plug BIO work function blk_zone_wplug_bio_work() calls
>> submit_bio_noacct_nocheck() to execute the next unplugged BIO. This
>> function may block. So executing zone plugs BIO works using the block
>> layer global kblockd workqueue can potentially lead to preformance or
>> latency issues as the number of concurrent work for a workqueue is
>> limited to WQ_DFL_ACTIVE (256).
>> 1) For a system with a large number of zoned disks, issuing write
>>    requests to otherwise unused zones may be delayed wiating for a work
>>    thread to become available.
>> 2) Requeue operations which use kblockd but are independent of zone
>>    write plugging may alsoi end up being delayed.
>>
>> To avoid these potential performance issues, create a workqueue per
>> zoned device to execute zone plugs BIO work. The workqueue max active
>> parameter is set to the maximum number of zone write plugs allocated
>> with the zone write plug mempool. This limit is equal to the maximum
>> number of open zones of the disk and defaults to 128 for disks that do
>> not have a limit on the number of open zones.
> 
> Looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Should the zone write plug submission do non-blocking submissions as well
> to avoid stalling in the workqueue thread all the time?

I do not think that the stalling actually happens that often. The 2 main cases I
see are:
1) Out of tag so we block on tag allocation when preparing the request in
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(), or
2) The device has BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING set for its tag set (e.g. nullblk with
memory backing).

For (1), we could use RQF_NOWAIT to prevent blocking, but then we would need to
retry later on with a timer to make forward progress for the plug. And I do not
think we can actually avoid (2). So in the end, I do not see a clean way to
completely avoid blocking in all cases.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-23  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-20  7:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for zone write plugging Damien Le Moal
2024-04-20  7:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] block: prevent freeing a zone write plug too early Damien Le Moal
2024-04-22  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-23  6:12     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-04-23 14:21   ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-23 15:16     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-04-23 15:36       ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-23 18:19         ` Damien Le Moal
2024-04-24 13:58           ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-20  7:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: use a per disk workqueue for zone write plugging Damien Le Moal
2024-04-22  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-23  6:01     ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-04-23 15:46 ` (subset) [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b3a868a-3c79-42cd-96bb-3bf288ee786b@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox