From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Nitesh Shetty" <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
"Kanchan Joshi" <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
"Anuj Gupta" <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
"Tushar Gohad" <tushar.gohad@intel.com>,
"William Power" <william.power@intel.com>,
"Phil Cayton" <phil.cayton@intel.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Alasdair Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@kernel.org>,
"Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"Benjamin Marzinski" <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"David Sterba" <dsterba@suse.com>,
"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/16] block: rename bi_bvec_done
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:46:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c5836c6b69ba764419eb5eff7b6d69a3cc348d8.1785596451.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1785596451.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
struct bvec_iter::bi_bvec_done is used an offset in the current bvec,
let's rename it accordingly for better clarity. We're also going to use
it for non-bvec based iteration, so drop the "bvec" part.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/block/biovecs.rst | 8 ++++----
block/bio.c | 4 ++--
block/blk-merge.c | 8 ++++----
block/blk-mq-dma.c | 2 +-
block/blk.h | 2 +-
drivers/block/loop.c | 2 +-
drivers/block/zloop.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/dm-io-rewind.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/md/dm-pcache/segment.c | 4 ++--
drivers/nvdimm/btt.c | 2 +-
drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/misc.h | 2 +-
include/linux/bvec.h | 14 +++++++-------
io_uring/net.c | 4 ++--
lib/iov_iter.c | 2 +-
net/ceph/messenger.c | 4 ++--
16 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/block/biovecs.rst b/Documentation/block/biovecs.rst
index 11126ed6f40f..49da2147b7d8 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/biovecs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/block/biovecs.rst
@@ -16,16 +16,16 @@ bv_len by the number of bytes completed in that biovec.
In the new scheme of things, everything that must be mutated in order to
partially complete a bio is segregated into struct bvec_iter: bi_sector,
bi_size and bi_idx have been moved there; and instead of modifying bv_offset
-and bv_len, struct bvec_iter has bi_bvec_done, which represents the number of
+and bv_len, struct bvec_iter has bi_offset, which represents the number of
bytes completed in the current bvec.
There are a bunch of new helper macros for hiding the gory details - in
particular, presenting the illusion of partially completed biovecs so that
-normal code doesn't have to deal with bi_bvec_done.
+normal code doesn't have to deal with bi_offset.
* Driver code should no longer refer to biovecs directly; we now have
bio_iovec() and bio_iter_iovec() macros that return literal struct biovecs,
- constructed from the raw biovecs but taking into account bi_bvec_done and
+ constructed from the raw biovecs but taking into account bi_offset and
bi_size.
bio_for_each_segment() has been updated to take a bvec_iter argument
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Other implications:
I.e. instead of using bio_iovec_idx() (or bio->bi_iovec[bio->bi_idx]), you
now use bio_iter_iovec(), which takes a bvec_iter and returns a
literal struct bio_vec - constructed on the fly from the raw biovec but
- taking into account bi_bvec_done (and bi_size).
+ taking into account bi_offset (and bi_size).
* bi_vcnt can't be trusted or relied upon by driver code - i.e. anything that
doesn't actually own the bio. The reason is twofold: firstly, it's not
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 500389f332d9..4074a0496b93 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct block_device *bdev, struct bio_vec *table,
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = 0;
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = 0;
bio->bi_iter.bi_idx = 0;
- bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done = 0;
+ bio->bi_iter.bi_offset = 0;
bio->bi_end_io = NULL;
bio->bi_private = NULL;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ void bio_iov_bvec_set(struct bio *bio, const struct iov_iter *iter)
bio->bi_io_vec = (struct bio_vec *)iter->bvec;
bio->bi_iter.bi_idx = 0;
- bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done = iter->iov_offset;
+ bio->bi_iter.bi_offset = iter->iov_offset;
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = iov_iter_count(iter);
bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CLONED);
}
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index ab1161ca69f1..258a726071d1 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline void bio_get_last_bvec(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bv)
bio_advance_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_size);
- if (!iter.bi_bvec_done)
+ if (!iter.bi_offset)
idx = iter.bi_idx - 1;
else /* in the middle of bvec */
idx = iter.bi_idx;
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ static inline void bio_get_last_bvec(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *bv)
*bv = bio->bi_io_vec[idx];
/*
- * iter.bi_bvec_done records actual length of the last bvec
+ * iter.bi_offset records actual length of the last bvec
* if this bio ends in the middle of one io vector
*/
- if (iter.bi_bvec_done)
- bv->bv_len = iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ if (iter.bi_offset)
+ bv->bv_len = iter.bi_offset;
}
static inline bool bio_will_gap(struct request_queue *q,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-dma.c b/block/blk-mq-dma.c
index bfdb9ed70741..88fd9cbc951f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-dma.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-dma.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static bool blk_map_iter_next(struct request *req, struct blk_map_iter *iter,
* one could be merged into it. This typically happens when moving to
* the next bio, but some callers also don't pack bvecs tight.
*/
- while (!iter->iter.bi_size || !iter->iter.bi_bvec_done) {
+ while (!iter->iter.bi_size || !iter->iter.bi_offset) {
struct bio_vec next;
if (!__blk_map_iter_next(iter))
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index eaac05815cb0..50abfd932886 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline bool bio_may_need_split(struct bio *bio,
return true;
bv = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
- if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > bv->bv_len - bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done)
+ if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > bv->bv_len - bio->bi_iter.bi_offset)
return true;
if ((bv->bv_offset | bv->bv_len) & lim->dma_alignment)
return true;
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 26d7130c3f55..8639fa34b847 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw,
__bvec_iter_bvec(rq->bio->bi_io_vec, rq->bio->bi_iter),
nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
- iter.iov_offset = rq->bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ iter.iov_offset = rq->bio->bi_iter.bi_offset;
}
atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2);
diff --git a/drivers/block/zloop.c b/drivers/block/zloop.c
index f97a20cfdb7c..0fef5db8e5b8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zloop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zloop.c
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static int zloop_do_rw(struct zloop_cmd *cmd)
iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw,
__bvec_iter_bvec(rq->bio->bi_io_vec, rq->bio->bi_iter),
nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
- iter.iov_offset = rq->bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ iter.iov_offset = rq->bio->bi_iter.bi_offset;
}
cmd->iocb.ki_pos = (cmd->sector - zone->start) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-io-rewind.c b/drivers/md/dm-io-rewind.c
index 6155b0117c9d..04f3fc8aeb6f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-io-rewind.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-io-rewind.c
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@ static inline bool dm_bvec_iter_rewind(const struct bio_vec *bv,
int idx;
iter->bi_size += bytes;
- if (bytes <= iter->bi_bvec_done) {
- iter->bi_bvec_done -= bytes;
+ if (bytes <= iter->bi_offset) {
+ iter->bi_offset -= bytes;
return true;
}
- bytes -= iter->bi_bvec_done;
+ bytes -= iter->bi_offset;
idx = iter->bi_idx - 1;
while (idx >= 0 && bytes && bytes > bv[idx].bv_len) {
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ static inline bool dm_bvec_iter_rewind(const struct bio_vec *bv,
if (WARN_ONCE(idx < 0 && bytes,
"Attempted to rewind iter beyond bvec's boundaries\n")) {
iter->bi_size -= bytes;
- iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
+ iter->bi_offset = 0;
iter->bi_idx = 0;
return false;
}
iter->bi_idx = idx;
- iter->bi_bvec_done = bv[idx].bv_len - bytes;
+ iter->bi_offset = bv[idx].bv_len - bytes;
return true;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/segment.c b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/segment.c
index 7e9818701445..8f8816e1c539 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/segment.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/segment.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ int segment_copy_to_bio(struct pcache_segment *segment,
iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_DEST, &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_iter.bi_idx],
bio_segments(bio), bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
- iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_offset;
if (bio_off)
iov_iter_advance(&iter, bio_off);
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int segment_copy_from_bio(struct pcache_segment *segment,
iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_iter.bi_idx],
bio_segments(bio), bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
- iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_offset;
if (bio_off)
iov_iter_advance(&iter, bio_off);
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c b/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c
index 7e1112960d7f..5d910a64503d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/btt.c
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ static int btt_rw_integrity(struct btt *btt, struct bio_integrity_payload *bip,
bv = bvec_iter_bvec(bip->bip_vec, bip->bip_iter);
/*
* The 'bv' obtained from bvec_iter_bvec has its .bv_len and
- * .bv_offset already adjusted for iter->bi_bvec_done, and we
+ * .bv_offset already adjusted for iter->bi_offset, and we
* can use those directly
*/
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index ba5c7b3e2a7c..ce03a0ea4ded 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_init_iter(struct nvme_tcp_request *req,
iov_iter_bvec(&req->iter, dir,
__bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter), nr_bvec,
bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
- req->iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ req->iter.iov_offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_offset;
}
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/misc.h b/fs/btrfs/misc.h
index 694be6d0562a..802060943180 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/misc.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/misc.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline struct bvec_iter init_bvec_iter_for_bio(struct bio *bio)
.bi_sector = 0,
.bi_size = bio_size,
.bi_idx = 0,
- .bi_bvec_done = 0,
+ .bi_offset = 0,
};
}
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index 92837e2743f1..fc566ee1c1ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct bvec_iter {
/*
* Current offset in the bvec entry pointed to by `bi_idx`.
*/
- unsigned int bi_bvec_done;
+ unsigned int bi_offset;
} __packed __aligned(4);
struct bvec_iter_all {
@@ -135,14 +135,14 @@ mp_bvec_iter_page(const struct bio_vec *bvecs, const struct bvec_iter iter)
static __always_inline unsigned int
mp_bvec_iter_len(const struct bio_vec *bvecs, const struct bvec_iter iter)
{
- return min(__bvec_iter_bvec(bvecs, iter)->bv_len - iter.bi_bvec_done,
+ return min(__bvec_iter_bvec(bvecs, iter)->bv_len - iter.bi_offset,
iter.bi_size);
}
static __always_inline unsigned int
mp_bvec_iter_offset(const struct bio_vec *bvecs, const struct bvec_iter iter)
{
- return __bvec_iter_bvec(bvecs, iter)->bv_offset + iter.bi_bvec_done;
+ return __bvec_iter_bvec(bvecs, iter)->bv_offset + iter.bi_offset;
}
static __always_inline unsigned int
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
}
iter->bi_size -= bytes;
- bytes += iter->bi_bvec_done;
+ bytes += iter->bi_offset;
while (bytes && bytes >= bv[idx].bv_len) {
bytes -= bv[idx].bv_len;
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
}
iter->bi_idx = idx;
- iter->bi_bvec_done = bytes;
+ iter->bi_offset = bytes;
return true;
}
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned int bytes)
{
- unsigned int done = iter->bi_bvec_done + bytes;
+ unsigned int done = iter->bi_offset + bytes;
if (done == bv[iter->bi_idx].bv_len) {
done = 0;
iter->bi_idx++;
}
- iter->bi_bvec_done = done;
+ iter->bi_offset = done;
iter->bi_size -= bytes;
}
diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index a74d15f7b7d2..439c99ad1884 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ static int io_sg_from_iter(struct sk_buff *skb,
return zerocopy_fill_skb_from_iter(skb, from, length);
bi.bi_size = min(from->count, length);
- bi.bi_bvec_done = from->iov_offset;
+ bi.bi_offset = from->iov_offset;
bi.bi_idx = 0;
while (bi.bi_size && frag < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
@@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static int io_sg_from_iter(struct sk_buff *skb,
from->bvec += bi.bi_idx;
from->nr_segs -= bi.bi_idx;
from->count -= copied;
- from->iov_offset = bi.bi_bvec_done;
+ from->iov_offset = bi.bi_offset;
skb->data_len += copied;
skb->len += copied;
diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
index de5c1040a4a0..d6f5d7e180b5 100644
--- a/lib/iov_iter.c
+++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
@@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ static ssize_t iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages(struct iov_iter *i,
}
bi.bi_idx = 0;
bi.bi_size = maxsize;
- bi.bi_bvec_done = skip;
+ bi.bi_offset = skip;
maxpages = want_pages_array(pages, maxsize, skip, maxpages);
if (!maxpages)
diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index 34b3097b4c7b..9c1b6cf8c36f 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bio_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
if (!cursor->resid)
return false; /* no more data */
- if (!bytes || (it->iter.bi_size && it->iter.bi_bvec_done &&
+ if (!bytes || (it->iter.bi_size && it->iter.bi_offset &&
page == bio_iter_page(it->bio, it->iter)))
return false; /* more bytes to process in this segment */
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static bool ceph_msg_data_bvecs_advance(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
if (!cursor->resid)
return false; /* no more data */
- if (!bytes || (cursor->bvec_iter.bi_bvec_done &&
+ if (!bytes || (cursor->bvec_iter.bi_offset &&
page == bvec_iter_page(bvecs, cursor->bvec_iter)))
return false; /* more bytes to process in this segment */
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 15:46 [PATCH v5 00/16] Add dmabuf read/write via io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] dma-buf: introduce initial file I/O infrastructure Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] iov_iter: add iterator type for dmabuf maps Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-03 13:20 ` Anuj gupta
2026-08-04 8:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] block: always adjust bi_offset on bio_advance_iter Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] block: move bvec init into __bio_clone Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] block: introduce bio_iov_iter_set() Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] block: introduce dma map backed bio type Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] block: add dma-buf support for raw bdev Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] nvme-pci: implement dma-buf backed requests Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-04 7:29 ` Anuj Gupta/Anuj Gupta
2026-08-04 8:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] nvme-pci: rename nvme_pci_sgl_set_data to nvme_pci_dma_iter_set_sgl Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] nvme-pci: add SGL support for the dmabuf path Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] io_uring/rsrc: introduce buf registration structure Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] io_uring/rsrc: extend buffer update Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] io_uring/rsrc: add uncloneable regbuf flag Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] io_uring/rsrc: add regbuf import flags Pavel Begunkov
2026-08-01 15:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] io_uring/rsrc: add dmabuf backed registered buffers Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c5836c6b69ba764419eb5eff7b6d69a3cc348d8.1785596451.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil.cayton@intel.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tushar.gohad@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=william.power@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox