* Re: [PATCH] sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN
[not found] <HK0PR01MB21634739CFCEA8CB1AC08E45ADD10@HK0PR01MB2163.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
@ 2018-11-28 13:23 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-12 20:21 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2018-11-28 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Xiao; +Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
On 11/28/18 5:36 AM, Yang Xiao wrote:
> From: Young Xiao <YangX92@hotmail.com>
>
> __vdc_tx_trigger should only loop on EAGAIN a finite
> number of times.
>
> See commit adddc32d6fde ("sunvnet: Do not spin in an
> infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN") for detail.
Looks good to me, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN
2018-11-28 13:23 ` [PATCH] sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN Jens Axboe
@ 2025-09-12 20:21 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz @ 2025-09-12 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Yang Xiao
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Anthony Yznaga, Sam James,
sparclinux
Hello Jens and Yang,
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 06:23 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/28/18 5:36 AM, Yang Xiao wrote:
> > From: Young Xiao <YangX92@hotmail.com>
> >
> > __vdc_tx_trigger should only loop on EAGAIN a finite
> > number of times.
> >
> > See commit adddc32d6fde ("sunvnet: Do not spin in an
> > infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN") for detail.
>
> Looks good to me, applied.
I am seeing a lot of I/O errors as a result of this change of Linux running
inside a SPARC T5-2 LDOM running on Solaris 11.4.81 and I'm wondering whether
this change was justified by the commit in adddc32d6fde ("sunvnet: Do not spin
in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN") only or whether there
were actual bug reports.
See the output below:
[19095.192532] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19095.192605] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 368208928 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 2 prio class 2
[19095.205681] XFS (vdiskc1): metadata I/O error in "xfs_buf_ioend+0x28c/0x600 [xfs]" at daddr 0x15f26420 len 32 error 5
[19432.043471] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.043529] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3732568 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
[19432.058821] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.058843] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3736256 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 4 prio class 2
[19432.074109] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.074128] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3736512 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 4 prio class 2
[19432.089425] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.089443] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3737024 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
[19432.100964] XFS (vdiskc1): metadata I/O error in "xfs_buf_ioend+0x28c/0x600 [xfs]" at daddr 0x38ec58 len 8 error 5
At least Oracle's UEK kernel for SPARC [1] does not contain this change which
is why I'm a bit reluctant to believe that the change is correct.
Adrian
> [1] https://github.com/oracle/linux-uek/tree/uek4/qu7/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-12 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <HK0PR01MB21634739CFCEA8CB1AC08E45ADD10@HK0PR01MB2163.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2018-11-28 13:23 ` [PATCH] sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN Jens Axboe
2025-09-12 20:21 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).