public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:45:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c922dc0-b76a-456d-9760-5cec6f12629d@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416035444.99569-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On 4/15/25 9:54 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Patch 1st ~ 7th simplifies & improves IO canceling when ublk server daemon
> is exiting by taking two stage canceling:
> 
> - canceling active uring_cmd from its cancel function
> 
> - move inflight requests aborting into ublk char device release handler
> 
> With this way, implementation is simplified a lot, meantime ub->mutex is
> not required before queue becomes quiesced, so forward progress is
> guaranteed.
> 
> This approach & main implementation is from Uday's patch of
> "improve detection and handling of ublk server exit".
> 
> The last patch is selftest code for showing the improvement ublk server
> exit, 30sec timeout is avoided, which depends on patchset of
> "[PATCH V2 00/13] selftests: ublk: test cleanup & add more tests"[1].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20250412023035.2649275-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/T/#medbf7024e57beaf1c53e4cef6e076421463839d0
> 
> Pass both ublk kernel selftests and ublksrv 'make test T=generic'.

Looks good to me - what are we targeting with this patchset? I think
an argument could be made for 6.15, curious what you're thinking?


-- 
Jens Axboe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-16 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16  3:54 [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Ming Lei
2025-04-16 18:35   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:02   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 23:31     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:09   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-16  3:54 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-16 18:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-04-17  0:03   ` [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-17  1:33 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c922dc0-b76a-456d-9760-5cec6f12629d@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox