From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
dlemoal@kernel.org, tieren@fnnas.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, song@kernel.org,
kmo@daterainc.com, satyat@google.com, ebiggers@google.com,
neil@brown.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 05/15] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:12:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f54d81a-d330-44b2-b667-3b13d516c576@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250901033220.42982-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/31/25 8:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> No functional changes are intended, some drivers like mdraid will split
> bio by internal processing, prepare to unify bio split codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 70d704615be5..e1afb07040c0 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -104,34 +104,55 @@ static unsigned int bio_allowed_max_sectors(const struct queue_limits *lim)
> return round_down(UINT_MAX, lim->logical_block_size) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * bio_submit_split_bioset - Submit a bio, splitting it at a designated sector
> + * @bio: the original bio to be submitted and split
> + * @split_sectors: the sector count at which to split
> + * @bs: the bio set used for allocating the new split bio
> + *
> + * The original bio is modified to contain the remaining sectors and submitted.
> + * The caller is responsible for submitting the returned bio.
> + *
> + * If succeed, the newly allocated bio representing the initial part will be
> + * returned, on failure NULL will be returned and original bio will fail.
> + */
> +struct bio *bio_submit_split_bioset(struct bio *bio, unsigned int split_sectors,
> + struct bio_set *bs)
> +{
> + struct bio *split = bio_split(bio, split_sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(split)) {
> + bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(PTR_ERR(split));
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + blkcg_bio_issue_init(split);
> + bio_chain(split, bio);
> + trace_block_split(split, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_zone_write_plugging(bio));
> + submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> +
> + return split;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_submit_split_bioset);
> +
> static struct bio *bio_submit_split(struct bio *bio, int split_sectors)
> {
> - if (unlikely(split_sectors < 0))
> - goto error;
> + if (unlikely(split_sectors < 0)) {
> + bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(split_sectors);
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + return NULL;
> + }
>
> if (split_sectors) {
> - struct bio *split;
> -
> - split = bio_split(bio, split_sectors, GFP_NOIO,
> - &bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->bio_split);
> - if (IS_ERR(split)) {
> - split_sectors = PTR_ERR(split);
> - goto error;
> - }
> - split->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
> - blkcg_bio_issue_init(split);
> - bio_chain(split, bio);
> - trace_block_split(split, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_zone_write_plugging(bio));
> - submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> - return split;
> + bio = bio_submit_split_bioset(bio, split_sectors,
> + &bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->bio_split);
> + if (bio)
> + bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
> }
This is a good opportunity to reduce the indentation level in this
function by adding something like this above the
bio_submit_split_bioset() call:
if (unlikely(split_sectors == 0))
return bio;
Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Hence:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 3:32 [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/15] block: cleanup bio_issue Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 6:22 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] block: add QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 0:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:54 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-04 2:44 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-04 5:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/15] md: fix mssing blktrace bio split events Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:53 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-04 0:58 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/15] blk-crypto: fix missing processing for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-03 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/15] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-02 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 7:57 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/15] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-09-01 8:03 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/15] md/raid10: add a new r10bio flag R10BIO_Returned Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/15] md/raid10: convert read/write to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/15] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/15] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-04 0:50 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/15] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/15] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 17:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 17:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:00 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 1:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-03 1:41 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 16:59 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-03 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-01 3:32 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/15] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 14:09 ` [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Bart Van Assche
2025-09-02 1:50 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 8:04 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f54d81a-d330-44b2-b667-3b13d516c576@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).