From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: build default queue map via irq_create_affinity_masks
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:06:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5164e557-25bd-377b-da95-ac4b87c99581@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210630035153.2099975-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On 30/06/2021 04:51, Ming Lei wrote:
> The default queue mapping builder of blk_mq_map_queues doesn't take NUMA
> topo into account, so the built mapping is pretty bad, since CPUs
> belonging to different NUMA node are assigned to same queue. It is
> observed that IOPS drops by ~30% when running two jobs on same hctx
> of null_blk from two CPUs belonging to two NUMA nodes compared with
> from same NUMA node.
>
> Address the issue by reusing irq_create_affinity_masks() for building
> the default queue mapping, so that we can re-use the mapping created
> for managed irq.
>
> Lots of drivers may benefit from the change, such as nvme pci poll,
> nvme tcp, ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 60 +++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> index 3db84d3197f1..946e373296a3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> @@ -10,67 +10,31 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
Similar to what Christoph mentioned, seems strange to be including
interrupt.h
>
> #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> #include "blk.h"
> #include "blk-mq.h"
>
> -static int queue_index(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap,
> - unsigned int nr_queues, const int q)
> -{
> - return qmap->queue_offset + (q % nr_queues);
> -}
> -
> -static int get_first_sibling(unsigned int cpu)
> -{
> - unsigned int ret;
> -
> - ret = cpumask_first(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> - if (ret < nr_cpu_ids)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return cpu;
> -}
> -
> int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
> {
> + struct irq_affinity_desc *masks = NULL;
> + struct irq_affinity affd = {0};
should this be simply {}? I forget...
> unsigned int *map = qmap->mq_map;
> unsigned int nr_queues = qmap->nr_queues;
> - unsigned int cpu, first_sibling, q = 0;
> + unsigned int q;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - map[cpu] = -1;
> + masks = irq_create_affinity_masks(nr_queues, &affd);
> + if (!masks)
> + return -ENOMEM;
should we fall back on something else here? Seems that this function
does not fail just because out of memory.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 3:51 [PATCH] block: build default queue map via irq_create_affinity_masks Ming Lei
2021-06-30 7:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-01 9:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-08 13:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-01 10:06 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-07-02 1:10 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5164e557-25bd-377b-da95-ac4b87c99581@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox