From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT to indicate device supports nowait
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:44:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51cdf08c-c8a4-6bbd-3342-7cdb2b510668@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808203246.sdjnpzixxz5brjaf@kernel.org>
On 08/08/2017 03:32 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:57:58PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>>
>> Nowait is a feature of direct AIO, where users can request
>> to return immediately if the I/O is going to block. This translates
>> to REQ_NOWAIT in bio.bi_opf flags. While request based devices
>> don't wait, stacked devices such as md/dm will.
>>
>> In order to explicitly mark stacked devices as supported, we
>> set the QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT in the queue_flags and return -EAGAIN
>> whenever the device would block.
>
> probably you should route this patch to Jens first, DM/MD are different trees.
Yes, I have sent it to linux-block as well, and he has commented as well.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 3 ++-
>> include/linux/blkdev.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 970b9c9638c5..1c9a981d88e5 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -2025,7 +2025,8 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
>> * if queue is not a request based queue.
>> */
>>
>> - if ((bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) && !queue_is_rq_based(q))
>> + if ((bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) && !queue_is_rq_based(q) &&
>> + !blk_queue_supports_nowait(q))
>> goto not_supported;
>>
>> part = bio->bi_bdev->bd_part;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> index 25f6a0cb27d3..fae021ebec1b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>> @@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ struct request_queue {
>> #define QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED 29 /* queue has been registered to a disk */
>> #define QUEUE_FLAG_SCSI_PASSTHROUGH 30 /* queue supports SCSI commands */
>> #define QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED 31 /* queue has been quiesced */
>> +#define QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT 32 /* stack device driver supports REQ_NOWAIT */
>>
>> #define QUEUE_FLAG_DEFAULT ((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) | \
>> (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_STACKABLE) | \
>> @@ -732,6 +733,7 @@ static inline void queue_flag_clear(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q)
>> #define blk_queue_dax(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DAX, &(q)->queue_flags)
>> #define blk_queue_scsi_passthrough(q) \
>> test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SCSI_PASSTHROUGH, &(q)->queue_flags)
>> +#define blk_queue_supports_nowait(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, &(q)->queue_flags)
>
> Should this bit consider under layer disks? For example, one raid array disk
> doesn't support NOWAIT, shouldn't we disable NOWAIT for the array?
Yes, it should. I will add a check before setting the flag. Thanks.
Request-based devices don't wait. So, they would not have this flag set.
It is only the bio-based, with the make_request_fn hook which need this.
>
> I have another generic question. If a bio is splitted into 2 bios, one bio
> doesn't need to wait but the other need to wait. We will return -EAGAIN for the
> second bio, so the whole bio will return -EAGAIN, but the first bio is already
> dispatched to disk. Is this correct behavior?
>
No, from a multi-device point of view, this is inconsistent. I have
tried the request bio returns -EAGAIN before the split, but I shall
check again. Where do you see this happening?
--
Goldwyn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 23:57 [PATCH 0/9] Nowait feature for stacked block devices Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT to indicate device supports nowait Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:32 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-08 20:36 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 2:18 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 11:38 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 17:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 17:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-09 11:44 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2017-08-09 15:02 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 15:35 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-09 20:21 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 22:16 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 1:17 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-10 2:07 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 2:17 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 11:49 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-10 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-08-10 17:15 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-10 17:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-07-26 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] md: Add nowait support to md Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:34 ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:39 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 11:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] md: raid5 " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:43 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 11:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] md: raid10 " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:40 ` Shaohua Li
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: add " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Add nowait support to raid1 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Add nowait support to dm-delay Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm-mpath: Add nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-04 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/9] Nowait support for stacked block devices Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT to indicate device supports nowait Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51cdf08c-c8a4-6bbd-3342-7cdb2b510668@suse.de \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox