From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] block: fix the DISCARD request merge
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:05:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52d2e36c-ed62-151d-e070-7edd06bfc24d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1540350450-15208-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Would anyone please take a look at this ?
Thanks in advance.
Jianchao
On 10/24/18 11:07 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> There are two cases when handle DISCARD merge.
> If max_discard_segments == 1, the bios/requests need to be contiguous
> to merge. If max_discard_segments > 1, it takes every bio as a range
> and different range needn't to be contiguous.
>
> But now, attempt_merge screws this up. It always consider contiguity
> for DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments > 1 and cannot merge
> contiguous DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments == 1, because
> rq_attempt_discard_merge always returns false in this case.
> This patch fixes both of the two cases above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> V3:
> - Introduce blk_discard_mergable into attempt_merge and
> blk_try_merge.
> - Some comment changes.
>
> V2:
> - Add max_discard_segments > 1 checking in attempt_merge.
> - Change patch title and comment.
> - Add more comment in attempt_merge
>
> block/blk-merge.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 42a4674..b258de0 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,22 @@ static void blk_account_io_merge(struct request *req)
> part_stat_unlock();
> }
> }
> +/*
> + * Two cases of handling DISCARD merge:
> + * If max_discard_segments > 1, the driver takes every bio
> + * as a range and send them to controller together. The ranges
> + * needn't to be contiguous.
> + * Otherwise, the bios/requests will be handled as same as
> + * others which should be contiguous.
> + */
> +static inline bool blk_discard_mergable(struct request *req)
> +{
> + if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> + queue_max_discard_segments(req->q) > 1)
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
>
> /*
> * For non-mq, this has to be called with the request spinlock acquired.
> @@ -731,12 +747,6 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> if (req_op(req) != req_op(next))
> return NULL;
>
> - /*
> - * not contiguous
> - */
> - if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) != blk_rq_pos(next))
> - return NULL;
> -
> if (rq_data_dir(req) != rq_data_dir(next)
> || req->rq_disk != next->rq_disk
> || req_no_special_merge(next))
> @@ -760,11 +770,16 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> * counts here. Handle DISCARDs separately, as they
> * have separate settings.
> */
> - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) {
> +
> + if (blk_discard_mergable(req)) {
> if (!req_attempt_discard_merge(q, req, next))
> return NULL;
> - } else if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next))
> + } else if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) == blk_rq_pos(next)) {
> + if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next))
> + return NULL;
> + } else {
> return NULL;
> + }
>
> /*
> * If failfast settings disagree or any of the two is already
> @@ -888,8 +903,7 @@ bool blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
>
> enum elv_merge blk_try_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
> {
> - if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> - queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1)
> + if (blk_discard_mergable(rq))
> return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE;
> else if (blk_rq_pos(rq) + blk_rq_sectors(rq) == bio->bi_iter.bi_sector)
> return ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 3:07 [PATCH V3] block: fix the DISCARD request merge Jianchao Wang
2018-10-24 11:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26 8:05 ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-10-26 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26 8:22 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52d2e36c-ed62-151d-e070-7edd06bfc24d@oracle.com \
--to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox