From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-174.mta0.migadu.com (out-174.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687213C3C for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 01:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717206589; cv=none; b=aUmheuSW7zfBQLkVOiwGc5Jx8MKALwuNEN0Zkrb0ZLPCisNKo4yztzVVNRdZ8Xr1NqA3QQlb6ppiCWKh7Ki1Z5K/5NceuLdYJ3Nu7R/Rnac2NulM4xNJrtMcqiPfYwlmjMU5QYVMWrsnbB5/FxGD8QlD40TRUIyvBthoVXjFZ8E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717206589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M8/pffXdKKDDc2omgjyG4lVjGiNptu8jJGHTnrYhQaE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Q9I1YkzuCZGuQQTraQ4k3OH4kGPF0OUJ5s3els/rVAb7mOAuzGCBjqyKf9aQ3Zu8npeyK8oCJQ24t5DzobhHdZIUDyJXCxLo4HX+721zbGXHbbd0AJg26l//CyX2zaU+hjc5jpNFni3W85pvjo1AXGzcbgYu75e+kLprl71nQEg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=h1JCQf3b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="h1JCQf3b" X-Envelope-To: bvanassche@acm.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1717206585; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V8WfBxq8XLRTBZ5tQIhY0Q9aeK+UOqcJTpHkcaQ+TpQ=; b=h1JCQf3bfvXrbdLOdGdABlt8LfZALDMGbAVnfTqDUYOxSM3Tq18lpwx0IEIulB64lhNDA3 hEnw9oEijJgYuLz0ms7jokSKK7Z/9F0rB7hrgOkVmnHSUmodBVnfAwpV9MjYzzJQb9nOBk 94sVvCusQLEVWDHsZow2xEDcZ6Ha9cQ= X-Envelope-To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com X-Envelope-To: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com X-Envelope-To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Envelope-To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: nbd@other.debian.org X-Envelope-To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <53f5e515-bad2-4094-ab7a-64d807ce1223@linux.dev> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 03:49:39 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel To: Bart Van Assche , Zhu Yanjun Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "nbd@other.debian.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" References: <6cd21274-50b3-44c5-af48-179cbd08b1ba@linux.dev> <0a82785a-a417-4f53-8f3a-2a9ad3ab3bf7@acm.org> <81a63f38-fab0-4536-bbc2-3f06752a7f9e@acm.org> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Zhu Yanjun In-Reply-To: <81a63f38-fab0-4536-bbc2-3f06752a7f9e@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 2024/5/31 22:46, Bart Van Assche 写道: > On 5/31/24 13:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:08 PM Bart Van Assche >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/31/24 13:06, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:01 PM Bart Van Assche >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 5/31/24 07:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>>>> IIRC, the problem with srp/002, 011 also occurs with siw driver, >>>>>> do you make >>>>>> tests with siw driver to verify whether the problem with srp/002, >>>>>> 011 is also > fixed or not? >>>>> >>>>> I have not yet seen any failures of any of the SRP tests when using >>>>> the siw driver. >>>>> What am I missing? >>>   > >>>   > (left out a bunch of forwarded emails) >>> >>> Forwarding emails is not useful, especially if these emails do not >>> answer the question >>> that I asked. >> >> Bob had made tests with siw. From his mail, it seems that the similar >> problem also occurs with SIW. > > I'm not aware of anyone other than Bob having reported failures of the > SRP tests > in combination with the siw driver. At that time, I had not reproduce this problem with SIW, either. Zhu Yanjun > > Thanks, > > Bart. >