public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Simplify the bio cloning implementation
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:48:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5766ea06-4016-6ad1-a18a-b2c9f31788cf@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180627011259.GC9970@ming.t460p>

On 06/26/18 18:13, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> There is no good reason to use different code paths for different
>> request operations. Hence remove the switch/case statement from
>> bio_clone_bioset().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   block/bio.c | 15 ++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
>> index f7e3d88bd0b6..4c27cc9ea55e 100644
>> --- a/block/bio.c
>> +++ b/block/bio.c
>> @@ -691,19 +691,8 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_bioset(struct bio *bio_src, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>>   	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector	= bio_src->bi_iter.bi_sector;
>>   	bio->bi_iter.bi_size	= bio_src->bi_iter.bi_size;
>>   
>> -	switch (bio_op(bio)) {
>> -	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
>> -	case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
>> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>> -		break;
>> -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
>> -		bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt++] = bio_src->bi_io_vec[0];
>> -		break;
>> -	default:
>> -		bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio_src, iter)
>> -			bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt++] = bv;
>> -		break;
>> -	}
>> +	bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio_src, iter)
>> +		bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt++] = bv;
> 
> The above change may not be correct for WRITE_SAME, since
> bio_src->bi_iter.bi_size should be the actual bytes to write by drive.

Since bio_for_each_segment() neither modifies bio_src->bi_iter nor 
bio->bi_iter, the above patch retains the value copied into 
bio->bi_iter.bi_size before bio_for_each_segment() was called. In other 
words, bio_src->bi_iter.bi_size is not modified and the resulting 
bio->bi_iter.bi_size should be identical with or without this patch.

> Also Christoph has killed bio_clone_bioset() already, and I think that is
> correct thing to do, see:
> 
> 	https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=152938432207215&w=2

Anyway, I'm fine with using Christoph's approach and dropping this patch.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-27 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-26 22:26 [PATCH] block: Simplify the bio cloning implementation Bart Van Assche
2018-06-27  1:13 ` Ming Lei
2018-06-27 17:48   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-06-27 23:20     ` Ming Lei
2018-06-27 23:55       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-28  0:08         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5766ea06-4016-6ad1-a18a-b2c9f31788cf@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox