From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: SMP affinity and the blk-mq I/O submission path
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:32:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576CE200.2040306@suse.de> (raw)
Hi Jens,
I've taken a pick at your mpt3sas branch, trying to make the mpt3sas
multiqueue aware. Sadly I've encountered some issues on the way, which
make me think we _might_ run into a locking issue.
Which also might be attributed to my imperfect knowledge of multiqueue
submission and SMP affinity in general, hence my question:
>From my understanding blk-mq works due to the fact that I/O submission
is local to the CPU, and hence we won't need (most) locks.
However, looking at the code I find that indeed the software queues are
CPU-local, but the hardware context is not.
Plus I haven't really seen any provisions for ensure the hardware
context (and hence the actual I/O submission) is running on any given CPU.
So if I have a device with just one MSI-X vector (bloody mpt2sas
firmware restriction) I would assign this vector to a specific CPU.
But then I have the problem that I/O submission can in principle happen
on _any_ CPU, whereas I/O completion will only happen on a specific CPU.
Which consequently means that we might run into locking issue if the I/O
submission happens on another CPU than the I/O completion.
Is this intended?
Plus, wouldn't we have a cacheline bouncing between those CPUs?
Shouldn't rather run the I/O submission in the same CPU than the I/O
completion?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-24 7:32 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-06-29 9:29 ` SMP affinity and the blk-mq I/O submission path Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576CE200.2040306@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).