From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] More patches for kernel v4.13
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 20:55:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578cb92c-4ebd-c5b7-903a-b248f709928f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170608173355.25898-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
On 06/08/2017 11:33 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Hello Jens,
>
> This patch series contains one patch that reduces the size of struct
> blk_mq_hw_ctx, a few patches that simplify some of the block layer code and
> also patches that improve the block layer documentation. Please consider these
> patches for kernel v4.13.
>
> The basis for these patches is a merge of your for-next and for-linus
> branches. Please note that the first patch in this series applies fine on top
> of the merge of these two branches but not on top of your for-next branch.
I seem to be missing some of the patches in this series, and I'm assuming
high likely hood of rejects due to recent churn. Would you mind resending
this series?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-08 17:33 [PATCH v3 00/12] More patches for kernel v4.13 Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] blk-mq: Reduce blk_mq_hw_ctx size Bart Van Assche
2017-06-19 2:26 ` Ming Lei
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] block: Make request operation type argument declarations consistent Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] block: Introduce request_queue.initialize_rq_fn() Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] block: Make most scsi_req_init() calls implicit Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] block: Change argument type of scsi_req_init() Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] blk-mq: Initialize a request before assigning a tag Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] block: Add a comment above queue_lockdep_assert_held() Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] block: Check locking assumptions at runtime Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] block: Document what queue type each function is intended for Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] blk-mq: Document locking assumptions Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] block: Constify disk_type Bart Van Assche
2017-06-08 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] blk-mq: Warn when attempting to run a hardware queue that is not mapped Bart Van Assche
2017-06-19 2:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-06-19 18:35 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] More patches for kernel v4.13 Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578cb92c-4ebd-c5b7-903a-b248f709928f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox