From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] genhd: Add return code to device_add_disk To: Fam Zheng , Cornelia Huck References: <1471418115-3654-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1471418115-3654-7-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <20160817104914.37087cb3.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20160817084823.GB19326@al.usersys.redhat.com> <20160817110645.45370f57.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20160817091422.GE19326@al.usersys.redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michael Ellerman , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch , Minchan Kim , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Brian Norris , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , Nitin Gupta From: Ed Cashin Message-ID: <57B50AD1.6010403@acm.org> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:09:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160817091422.GE19326@al.usersys.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed List-ID: On 08/17/2016 05:14 AM, Fam Zheng wrote: ... > Of course, the plan is to write patches on top. I'm not cleaning up anything > here because I'm concerned callers may double free (and I didn't look hard into > that). Aside from Huck's concerns, the changes looked OK from aoe's perspective. -- Ed