From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: defer the queue limits clear to a workqueue
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 21:14:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <583d8fd2-3f10-4714-8cdb-5b9d27f3cf11@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6af880e-66df-484d-b776-8ca72aac3b1a@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
在 2026/9/1 00:25, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 8/28/26 12:20 AM, Tao Cui wrote:
>> The code already has an XXX comment saying this should move to a
>> workqueue. Do that: schedule a work item on the system workqueue,
>> where it is safe to freeze the queue and update the limits using
>> queue_limits_commit_update_frozen().
> The patch description explains why queue freezing is necessary but
> does not add queue freeze and unfreeze calls. Is that perhaps an
> oversight?
>
Good question, I should have spelled this out in the commit
message. The freeze and unfreeze are inside
queue_limits_commit_update_frozen() itself (block/blk-settings.c):
memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
ret = queue_limits_commit_update(q, lim);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags);
The naming is a bit counterintuitive: the _frozen variant is the
one that freezes the queue itself, while the plain
queue_limits_commit_update() expects the caller to have frozen the
queue already ("The caller must have frozen the queue or ensure
that there are no outstanding I/Os by other means"). The in-tree
callers use it that way too - blk_integrity_unregister() and the
sd.c revalidation paths call the _frozen variant without freezing
the queue themselves.
The old loop_clear_limits() was exactly a caller that did not meet
that expectation, since it ran in the loop workqueue where the
queue cannot be frozen, so moving to the work item and using the
_frozen wrapper is the fix.
Thanks,
Tao
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 7:20 [PATCH] loop: defer the queue limits clear to a workqueue Tao Cui
2026-08-28 16:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-31 13:34 ` Tao Cui
2026-08-31 16:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-01 13:14 ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-09-01 17:29 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=583d8fd2-3f10-4714-8cdb-5b9d27f3cf11@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox