From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbd: fix spelling mistake: "reregisteration" -> "re-registration" To: Colin King , Ilya Dryomov , Sage Weil , Alex Elder , Jens Axboe , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <20180319133310.4251-1-colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dongsheng Yang Message-ID: <5AB0E3D5.6090301@easystack.cn> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:35:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180319133310.4251-1-colin.king@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-ID: Hi Colin, On 03/19/2018 09:33 PM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in rdb_warn message text > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c > index 1e03b04819c8..7b97240ff15e 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c > +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c > @@ -3887,7 +3887,7 @@ static void rbd_reregister_watch(struct work_struct *work) > > ret = rbd_dev_refresh(rbd_dev); > if (ret) > - rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "reregisteration refresh failed: %d", ret); > + rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "re-registration refresh failed: %d", ret); Hmmm, I am not sure is that a spelling mistake, because the function name is rbd_reregister_watch(). Thanx Yang > } > > /*