public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix deadlock between blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_mq_dispatch_list
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:31:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fec2f0f-97e5-2c7a-73bd-ad2ad95f2e1d@allwinnertech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417082744.30124-1-michael@allwinnertech.com>

I'd like to add some important information:

The three processes I mentioned—Task 1838 (Back-P10-3), Task 619 
(android.hardwar), and Task 1865 (sp-control-1)—are all in an 
uninterruptible sleep state. Therefore, once Task 1865 (sp-control-1) is 
scheduled out using `preempt_schedule_notrace`, it cannot be scheduled 
back. The reason Task 1865 (sp-control-1) is in an uninterruptible sleep 
state is because `down_write` is waiting for `io_rwsem`.

My analysis of the upstream kernel code doesn't seem to have found a fix 
for this issue. This situation should theoretically exist, but I don't 
have a platform to test this low-probability behavior. However, it's 
certain that this situation occurs during I/O scheduling algorithm 
switching and concurrent F2FS write operations.

In this situation, `io_schedule_prepare` is not used. The path used in 
Task 1865 is 
`schedule->sched_submit_work->blk_flush_plug->blk_mq_dispatch_list`.

As you said, this method is indeed not good, but I don't have a better 
idea to handle this deadlock situation.

On 2026/4/17 16:27, Michael Wu wrote:
> Kernel: Linux version 6.18.16
> Platform: Android
> 
> A three-way deadlock can occur between blk_mq_freeze_queue and
> blk_mq_dispatch_list involving percpu_ref reference counting and rwsem
> synchronization:
> 
> - Task A holds io_rwsem (e.g., F2FS write path) and enters __bio_queue_enter(),
>    where it acquires percpu_ref and waits for mq_freeze_depth==0
> - Task B holds mq_freeze_depth=1 (elevator_change) and waits for
>    q_usage_counter to reach zero in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait()
> - Task C is scheduled out via schedule() while waiting for io_rwsem.
>    Before switching, __blk_flush_plug() triggers blk_mq_dispatch_list()
>    which acquires percpu_ref via percpu_ref_get(). If preempt_schedule_notrace()
>    is triggered before percpu_ref_put(), Task C holds the reference while
>    blocked on the rwsem.
> 
> Since Task C cannot release its percpu_ref while blocked, Task B cannot
> unfreeze the queue, and Task A cannot proceed to release the io_rwsem,
> creating a circular dependency deadlock.
> 
> Change:
> Fix by disabling preemption in blk_mq_dispatch_list() when called from
> schedule() (from_sched=true), ensuring percpu_ref_get() and percpu_ref_put()
> are atomic with respect to context switches. With from_sched=true,
> blk_mq_run_hw_queue() dispatches asynchronously via kblockd, so no driver
> callbacks run in this context and preempt_disable() is safe.
> 
> Detailed scenario description:
> When process 1838 performs f2fs_submit_page_write, it obtains io_rwsem via
> f2fs_down_write_trace. When process 1865 performs f2fs_down_write_trace and
> wants to obtain io_rwsem, it needs to wait for process 1838 to release it,
> so it can only be scheduled out via schedule. Before being scheduled out,
> it clears the plug via __blk_flush_plug, so it will run to blk_mq_dispatch_list.
> Process 619 is modifying the I/O scheduling algorithm, calling elevator_change
> to set mq_freeze_depth=1. After that, blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait will wait for
> the reference count of q_usage_counter to return to zero. Coincidentally,
> process 1838 needs to wait for mq_freeze_depth=0 when it reaches
> __bio_queue_enter, so it can only wait to be woken up after q_freeze_depth=0.
> At this time, process 1865, when blk_mq_dispatch_list reaches the point where
> percpu_ref_get increments the q_usage_counter reference, and before
> percpu_ref_put, it calls preempt_schedule_notrace to schedule the process out
> due to preemption, causing q_usage_counter to never reach zero.
> 
> At this point, process 1865 depends on io_rwsem to wake up, process 1838
> depends on mq_freeze_depth=0 to wake up, and process 619 depends on
> q_usage_counter being zero to wake up and unfreeze (setting mq_freeze_depth=0),
> resulting in a deadlock between these three processes.
> 
> Stack traces from the deadlock:
> 
> Task 1838 (Back-P10-3) - holds io_rwsem, waiting for queue unfreeze:
> Call trace:
>   __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
>   __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
>   schedule+0x54/0xf8
>   __bio_queue_enter+0xbc/0x19c
>   blk_mq_submit_bio+0x118/0x814
>   __submit_bio+0x9c/0x234
>   submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x10c/0x2d4
>   submit_bio_noacct+0x354/0x544
>   submit_bio+0x1e8/0x208
>   f2fs_submit_write_bio+0x44/0xe4
>   __submit_merged_bio+0x40/0x114
>   f2fs_submit_page_write+0x3f0/0x7e0
>   do_write_page+0x180/0x2fc
>   f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x78/0x100
>   f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x3b8/0x500
>   f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x1ac/0x6e0
>   f2fs_write_data_pages+0x838/0xdfc
>   do_writepages+0xd0/0x19c
>   filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x204/0x274
>   f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x54/0x960
>   __f2fs_ioctl+0x2128/0x42c8
>   f2fs_ioctl+0x38/0xb4
>   __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa0/0xf4
> 
> Task 619 (android.hardwar) - holds mq_freeze_depth=1, waiting for percpu_ref:
> Call trace:
>   __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
>   __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
>   schedule+0x54/0xf8
>   blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x68/0xb0
>   blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x68/0x7c
>   elevator_change+0x70/0x14c
>   elv_iosched_store+0x1b0/0x234
>   queue_attr_store+0xe0/0x134
>   sysfs_kf_write+0x98/0xbc
>   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1e8
>   vfs_write+0x2e8/0x448
>   ksys_write+0x78/0xf0
>   __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c
> 
> Task 1865 (sp-control-1) - holds percpu_ref, preempted in dispatch_list:
> Call trace:
>   __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
>   __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
>   preempt_schedule_notrace+0x60/0x7c
>   blk_mq_dispatch_list+0x5c0/0x690
>   blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x13c/0x170
>   __blk_flush_plug+0x11c/0x17c
>   schedule+0x40/0xf8
>   schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40
>   rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x61c/0xc88
>   down_write+0x3c/0x158
>   f2fs_down_write_trace+0x30/0x84
>   f2fs_submit_page_write+0x78/0x7e0
>   do_write_page+0x180/0x2fc
>   f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x78/0x100
>   f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x3b8/0x500
>   f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x1ac/0x6e0
>   f2fs_write_data_pages+0x838/0xdfc
>   do_writepages+0xd0/0x19c
>   filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x204/0x274
>   f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x54/0x960
>   __f2fs_ioctl+0x2128/0x42c8
>   f2fs_ioctl+0x38/0xb4
>   __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa0/0xf4
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-mq.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 4c5c16cce4f8f..c290bb12c1ecb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2936,6 +2936,14 @@ static void blk_mq_dispatch_list(struct rq_list *rqs, bool from_sched)
>   	*rqs = requeue_list;
>   	trace_block_unplug(this_hctx->queue, depth, !from_sched);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * When called from schedule(), prevent preemption and interrupts between
> +	 * ref_get and ref_put. This ensures percpu_ref_get() and percpu_ref_put()
> +	 * are atomic with respect to context switches, avoiding a deadlock with
> +	 * blk_mq_freeze_queue where a blocked task holds a percpu_ref reference.
> +	 */
> +	if (from_sched)
> +		local_irq_disable();
>   	percpu_ref_get(&this_hctx->queue->q_usage_counter);
>   	/* passthrough requests should never be issued to the I/O scheduler */
>   	if (is_passthrough) {
> @@ -2951,6 +2959,8 @@ static void blk_mq_dispatch_list(struct rq_list *rqs, bool from_sched)
>   		blk_mq_insert_requests(this_hctx, this_ctx, &list, from_sched);
>   	}
>   	percpu_ref_put(&this_hctx->queue->q_usage_counter);
> +	if (from_sched)
> +		local_irq_enable();
>   }
>   
>   static void blk_mq_dispatch_multiple_queue_requests(struct rq_list *rqs)

-- 
Regards,
Michael Wu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-17  8:27 [PATCH] block: fix deadlock between blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_mq_dispatch_list Michael Wu
2026-04-17 15:15 ` Ming Lei
2026-04-20  6:31 ` Michael Wu [this message]
2026-04-20  7:02   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fec2f0f-97e5-2c7a-73bd-ad2ad95f2e1d@allwinnertech.com \
    --to=michael@allwinnertech.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox