From: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix deadlock between blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_mq_dispatch_list
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:31:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fec2f0f-97e5-2c7a-73bd-ad2ad95f2e1d@allwinnertech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417082744.30124-1-michael@allwinnertech.com>
I'd like to add some important information:
The three processes I mentioned—Task 1838 (Back-P10-3), Task 619
(android.hardwar), and Task 1865 (sp-control-1)—are all in an
uninterruptible sleep state. Therefore, once Task 1865 (sp-control-1) is
scheduled out using `preempt_schedule_notrace`, it cannot be scheduled
back. The reason Task 1865 (sp-control-1) is in an uninterruptible sleep
state is because `down_write` is waiting for `io_rwsem`.
My analysis of the upstream kernel code doesn't seem to have found a fix
for this issue. This situation should theoretically exist, but I don't
have a platform to test this low-probability behavior. However, it's
certain that this situation occurs during I/O scheduling algorithm
switching and concurrent F2FS write operations.
In this situation, `io_schedule_prepare` is not used. The path used in
Task 1865 is
`schedule->sched_submit_work->blk_flush_plug->blk_mq_dispatch_list`.
As you said, this method is indeed not good, but I don't have a better
idea to handle this deadlock situation.
On 2026/4/17 16:27, Michael Wu wrote:
> Kernel: Linux version 6.18.16
> Platform: Android
>
> A three-way deadlock can occur between blk_mq_freeze_queue and
> blk_mq_dispatch_list involving percpu_ref reference counting and rwsem
> synchronization:
>
> - Task A holds io_rwsem (e.g., F2FS write path) and enters __bio_queue_enter(),
> where it acquires percpu_ref and waits for mq_freeze_depth==0
> - Task B holds mq_freeze_depth=1 (elevator_change) and waits for
> q_usage_counter to reach zero in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait()
> - Task C is scheduled out via schedule() while waiting for io_rwsem.
> Before switching, __blk_flush_plug() triggers blk_mq_dispatch_list()
> which acquires percpu_ref via percpu_ref_get(). If preempt_schedule_notrace()
> is triggered before percpu_ref_put(), Task C holds the reference while
> blocked on the rwsem.
>
> Since Task C cannot release its percpu_ref while blocked, Task B cannot
> unfreeze the queue, and Task A cannot proceed to release the io_rwsem,
> creating a circular dependency deadlock.
>
> Change:
> Fix by disabling preemption in blk_mq_dispatch_list() when called from
> schedule() (from_sched=true), ensuring percpu_ref_get() and percpu_ref_put()
> are atomic with respect to context switches. With from_sched=true,
> blk_mq_run_hw_queue() dispatches asynchronously via kblockd, so no driver
> callbacks run in this context and preempt_disable() is safe.
>
> Detailed scenario description:
> When process 1838 performs f2fs_submit_page_write, it obtains io_rwsem via
> f2fs_down_write_trace. When process 1865 performs f2fs_down_write_trace and
> wants to obtain io_rwsem, it needs to wait for process 1838 to release it,
> so it can only be scheduled out via schedule. Before being scheduled out,
> it clears the plug via __blk_flush_plug, so it will run to blk_mq_dispatch_list.
> Process 619 is modifying the I/O scheduling algorithm, calling elevator_change
> to set mq_freeze_depth=1. After that, blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait will wait for
> the reference count of q_usage_counter to return to zero. Coincidentally,
> process 1838 needs to wait for mq_freeze_depth=0 when it reaches
> __bio_queue_enter, so it can only wait to be woken up after q_freeze_depth=0.
> At this time, process 1865, when blk_mq_dispatch_list reaches the point where
> percpu_ref_get increments the q_usage_counter reference, and before
> percpu_ref_put, it calls preempt_schedule_notrace to schedule the process out
> due to preemption, causing q_usage_counter to never reach zero.
>
> At this point, process 1865 depends on io_rwsem to wake up, process 1838
> depends on mq_freeze_depth=0 to wake up, and process 619 depends on
> q_usage_counter being zero to wake up and unfreeze (setting mq_freeze_depth=0),
> resulting in a deadlock between these three processes.
>
> Stack traces from the deadlock:
>
> Task 1838 (Back-P10-3) - holds io_rwsem, waiting for queue unfreeze:
> Call trace:
> __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
> __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
> schedule+0x54/0xf8
> __bio_queue_enter+0xbc/0x19c
> blk_mq_submit_bio+0x118/0x814
> __submit_bio+0x9c/0x234
> submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x10c/0x2d4
> submit_bio_noacct+0x354/0x544
> submit_bio+0x1e8/0x208
> f2fs_submit_write_bio+0x44/0xe4
> __submit_merged_bio+0x40/0x114
> f2fs_submit_page_write+0x3f0/0x7e0
> do_write_page+0x180/0x2fc
> f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x78/0x100
> f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x3b8/0x500
> f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x1ac/0x6e0
> f2fs_write_data_pages+0x838/0xdfc
> do_writepages+0xd0/0x19c
> filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x204/0x274
> f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x54/0x960
> __f2fs_ioctl+0x2128/0x42c8
> f2fs_ioctl+0x38/0xb4
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa0/0xf4
>
> Task 619 (android.hardwar) - holds mq_freeze_depth=1, waiting for percpu_ref:
> Call trace:
> __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
> __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
> schedule+0x54/0xf8
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x68/0xb0
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x68/0x7c
> elevator_change+0x70/0x14c
> elv_iosched_store+0x1b0/0x234
> queue_attr_store+0xe0/0x134
> sysfs_kf_write+0x98/0xbc
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x118/0x1e8
> vfs_write+0x2e8/0x448
> ksys_write+0x78/0xf0
> __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c
>
> Task 1865 (sp-control-1) - holds percpu_ref, preempted in dispatch_list:
> Call trace:
> __switch_to+0x1a4/0x35c
> __schedule+0x8e0/0xec4
> preempt_schedule_notrace+0x60/0x7c
> blk_mq_dispatch_list+0x5c0/0x690
> blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x13c/0x170
> __blk_flush_plug+0x11c/0x17c
> schedule+0x40/0xf8
> schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40
> rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x61c/0xc88
> down_write+0x3c/0x158
> f2fs_down_write_trace+0x30/0x84
> f2fs_submit_page_write+0x78/0x7e0
> do_write_page+0x180/0x2fc
> f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x78/0x100
> f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x3b8/0x500
> f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x1ac/0x6e0
> f2fs_write_data_pages+0x838/0xdfc
> do_writepages+0xd0/0x19c
> filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x204/0x274
> f2fs_commit_atomic_write+0x54/0x960
> __f2fs_ioctl+0x2128/0x42c8
> f2fs_ioctl+0x38/0xb4
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa0/0xf4
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 4c5c16cce4f8f..c290bb12c1ecb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2936,6 +2936,14 @@ static void blk_mq_dispatch_list(struct rq_list *rqs, bool from_sched)
> *rqs = requeue_list;
> trace_block_unplug(this_hctx->queue, depth, !from_sched);
>
> + /*
> + * When called from schedule(), prevent preemption and interrupts between
> + * ref_get and ref_put. This ensures percpu_ref_get() and percpu_ref_put()
> + * are atomic with respect to context switches, avoiding a deadlock with
> + * blk_mq_freeze_queue where a blocked task holds a percpu_ref reference.
> + */
> + if (from_sched)
> + local_irq_disable();
> percpu_ref_get(&this_hctx->queue->q_usage_counter);
> /* passthrough requests should never be issued to the I/O scheduler */
> if (is_passthrough) {
> @@ -2951,6 +2959,8 @@ static void blk_mq_dispatch_list(struct rq_list *rqs, bool from_sched)
> blk_mq_insert_requests(this_hctx, this_ctx, &list, from_sched);
> }
> percpu_ref_put(&this_hctx->queue->q_usage_counter);
> + if (from_sched)
> + local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> static void blk_mq_dispatch_multiple_queue_requests(struct rq_list *rqs)
--
Regards,
Michael Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 8:27 [PATCH] block: fix deadlock between blk_mq_freeze_queue and blk_mq_dispatch_list Michael Wu
2026-04-17 15:15 ` Ming Lei
2026-04-20 6:31 ` Michael Wu [this message]
2026-04-20 7:02 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5fec2f0f-97e5-2c7a-73bd-ad2ad95f2e1d@allwinnertech.com \
--to=michael@allwinnertech.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox