From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B02C46467 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230129AbiK2OA1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:00:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35862 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230148AbiK2OA0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:00:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF6F2AC65 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 06:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id v3so13092468pgh.4 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 06:00:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vfmdPrG/d/sdcfBpP/NPY9FRIiiTUjLGS4u7Y99UOIE=; b=oGZ/Yt/gIKSQvsmmQAqcqfOeW8pLTBZ4YW8Ym0mEQmIDNl5xMsrQl5yKcC1yfph0lv VWJkIZGtWuD/YOiGYGQvZVo5EmLaBfe051c6fokhgSyIjPtz7Nho5gEoeXmDikdvp10V VneR3YhPNehWBtWji7zUkuLqXzBIEzgbn8OpBXNhk60XRLhNXQn/vNXNMKIVhWcapXdw ju9p+VGhx8ZOTMLRo/aTaNfdUCPx5CM4/opnYwAGqgZ2/tx/BpmnvR8wUg+1QB4geIFp PlM5sGl4kAqj8HRJcTY4h42mOtNpLriihJ50p+eTyVRlNf/K2Gp/LLzwik2tHbJ3E5rR ejzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vfmdPrG/d/sdcfBpP/NPY9FRIiiTUjLGS4u7Y99UOIE=; b=Ewl9KQ2bY+5bsLOFFdQ86w1g6huitxqZPBZsEZvehsuvr7/kcY+lENKtCnku2Pz4IV FGxsjYtKe2MZDc4StBH7GG0ckjafE7ABy0BvO1wsinzio8jWD/R093TMy1Ct51iAb87c F3pupbny3hF6S2JZqRKPF4xsd4/ibXtTfdw/Z7Vw39h3rxgpMX7rsjnMl3ddgkk/0xXP PmGEOb76dbOrOGIr1eDeVcEsRds0cWkIcSyQantX7lJw/bIKDHAFdePyS0b/tV0PcZFW UTs+Mc9QRwD91AnEg77D+05DBJ0JaoPSuDD2lNnso2HgVGtD9VBXhOoLuOO4OdLvnYww JPsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pm8JVzy3R13gJ5D3YKTC0G2L2eg0fKk/MbK0rrznh6lkawyw7LJ KQ5WzFQbi8OokSAfeDu2gLajOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5pYbhR7pkuhHMFk67yso4Z04ENb6/JaLVqnj5Qm3hFaKDh2I38Mgs3uXFHWikR7bv14adqbw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d21:0:b0:438:c2f0:c2cf with SMTP id c33-20020a630d21000000b00438c2f0c2cfmr17408182pgl.116.1669730425127; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 06:00:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.136] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kb1-20020a17090ae7c100b0020b21019086sm1863999pjb.3.2022.11.29.06.00.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 06:00:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <613117ce-56ce-10cb-1548-eac1741ceae5@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:00:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] block/scsi/nvme: Add error codes for PR ops Content-Language: en-US To: "hch@lst.de" , Chaitanya Kulkarni Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Mike Christie , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "axboe@fb.com" , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" References: <20221122032603.32766-1-michael.christie@oracle.com> <538bcade-c453-e6f8-4530-808a9bf2140a@nvidia.com> <20221129132805.GA13061@lst.de> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20221129132805.GA13061@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 11/29/22 6:28 AM, hch@lst.de wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:18:19AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >>> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen >>> >> >> perhaps a block tree since it has block/scsi/nvme ? > > I think Mike has SCSI work that builds on top of this, and reservations > ar originally a SCSI feature. But either block or scsi is fine with > me. I'm fine with scsi or block, I'm assuming we won't have any conflicts from this on the block/nvme side? If we're doing block just let me know and I can queue it up. -- Jens Axboe