From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com" <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] blk-mq: Add a polling specific stats function
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:34:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6617fde7-4866-4a2d-6cf5-dc8b2c678186@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E9E52B3-977A-4159-83B3-758564FF67AD@raithlin.com>
On 04/20/2017 02:33 PM, Stephen Bates wrote:
>
>> Nah, let's just leave it as-is then, even though I don't think it's the
>> prettiest thing I've ever seen.
>
> I did look at making the stats buckets in the request_queue struct
> based on dir and size. Something like:
>
> - struct blk_rq_stat poll_stat[2];
> + struct blk_rq_stat poll_stat[2][BLK_MQ_POLL_STATS_BKTS/2];
>
> This actually did clean up some in some places but because the
> callback still uses a linear array of buckets we do get this:
>
> - if (cb->stat[READ].nr_samples)
> - q->poll_stat[READ] = cb->stat[READ];
> - if (cb->stat[WRITE].nr_samples)
> - q->poll_stat[WRITE] = cb->stat[WRITE];
> + for (bucket = 0; bucket < BLK_MQ_POLL_STATS_BKTS; bucket++) {
> + if (cb->stat[bucket].nr_samples)
> + q->poll_stat[bucket%2][bucket/2] = cb->stat[bucket];
>
> I tend to agree with Omar that keeping the buckets in a linear array
> is overall cleaner and more generalized.
I agree, it's fine as-is. We should queue it up for 4.12.
> However right now I am stuck as I am seeing the kernel oops I reported
> before in testing of my latest patchset [1]. I will try and find some
> time to bisect that but it looks like it was introduced when the
> support for mq schedulers was added (on or around bd166ef18).
Just replied to that one, let me know if the suggestion works.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-07 12:24 [PATCH v3 0/2] blk-stat: Add ability to not bucket IO; improve IO polling sbates
2017-04-07 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] blk-stat: convert blk-stat bucket callback to signed sbates
2017-04-07 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] blk-mq: Add a polling specific stats function sbates
2017-04-20 20:07 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-20 20:16 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-20 20:20 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-04-20 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-20 20:33 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 20:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-04-20 20:47 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 20:53 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-20 21:08 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 21:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-20 21:41 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 21:42 ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-20 21:45 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 22:05 ` Stephen Bates
2017-04-20 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6617fde7-4866-4a2d-6cf5-dc8b2c678186@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox