From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"dm-devel@lists.linux.dev" <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: sysfs integrity fields use
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:23:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67795955-93a4-405b-b0b7-e6b5d921f35e@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I tried to add some support for using devices with PI/DIF metadata
and checked (through sysfs) how large metadata space per sector
is available.
The problem is that some values behave differently than I expected.
For an NVMe drive, reformatted to 4096 + 64 profile, I see this:
- /sys/block/<disk>/integrity/device_is_integrity_capable
Contains 0 (?)
According to docs, this field
"Indicates whether a storage device is capable of storing integrity metadata.
Set if the device is T10 PI-capable."
- /sys/block/<disk>/integrity/format
Contains expected "nop" (not "none")
- /sys/block/<disk>/integrity/tag_size
Contains 0 (?)
According to docs, this is "Number of bytes of integrity tag space
available per 512 bytes of data."
(I think 512 bytes is incorrect; it should be sector size, or perhaps
value in protection_interval_bytes, though.)
Then we have new (undocumented) value for NVMe in
- /sys/block/<nvme>/integrity/metadata_bytes
This contains the correct 64.
Anyway, when I try to use it (for authentication tags in dm-crypt), it works.
Should tag_size and device_is_integrity_capable be set even for the "nop" format?
Is it a bug or a feature? :-)
If not, what is the correct way to read per-sector metadata size (not only for NVMe
as metadata_bytes is not available for other block devices)?
(This is on recent Linus' master - 6.14.0-rc4)
Thanks,
Milan
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250225092525epcas5p31dd0a19ffdfb39f3f2ce4acd1c6da7ee@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-02-25 9:23 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2025-02-25 10:10 ` sysfs integrity fields use Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 10:44 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 11:03 ` Milan Broz
2025-02-26 10:04 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-02-25 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 14:02 ` Milan Broz
2025-02-27 14:46 ` [PATCH] docs: sysfs-block: Clarify integrity sysfs attributes for non-PI metadata Milan Broz
2025-03-03 17:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-03 18:52 ` Milan Broz
2025-03-06 2:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-18 15:44 ` [PATCH] docs: sysfs-block: Clarify integrity sysfs attributes Milan Broz
2025-03-20 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67795955-93a4-405b-b0b7-e6b5d921f35e@gmail.com \
--to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox