From: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE_BUT_REALLY) to avoid unwritten extents?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:44:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d982635-d978-e044-4cca-c140401eb0d3@scylladb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112213633.fb4tjlgvo6tznfr4@alap3.anarazel.de>
On 1/12/21 11:36 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-01-12 13:14:45 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> ALLOCSP64 can only allocate pre-zeroed blocks as part of extending EOF,
>> whereas a new FZERO flag means that we can pre-zero an arbitrary range
>> of bytes in a file. I don't know if Avi or Andres' usecases demand that
>> kind of flexibilty but I know I'd rather go for the more powerful
>> interface.
> Postgres/I don't at the moment have a need to allocate "written" zeroed
> space anywhere but EOF. I can see some potential uses for more flexible
> pre-zeroing in the future though, but not very near term.
>
Same here.
I also agree that it's better not to have the kernel fall back
internally on writing zeros, letting userspace do that. The assumption
is that WRITE SAME will be O(1)-ish and so can bypass scheduling
decisions, but if we need to write zeros, better let the application
throttle the rate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-30 6:28 fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE_BUT_REALLY) to avoid unwritten extents? Andres Freund
2021-01-04 18:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-04 19:10 ` Andres Freund
2021-01-04 19:57 ` Avi Kivity
2021-01-12 18:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-12 18:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-01-12 18:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-12 18:51 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-01-12 21:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-12 21:36 ` Andres Freund
2021-01-13 7:44 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2021-01-19 3:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-01-04 19:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-01-04 19:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-04 20:29 ` Andres Freund
2021-01-04 22:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-01-06 22:52 ` Dave Chinner
2021-01-06 23:40 ` Andres Freund
2021-01-08 20:32 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d982635-d978-e044-4cca-c140401eb0d3@scylladb.com \
--to=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox