public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, kch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 12:50:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f76d0ec-a746-4eaf-abe9-86b51d2ff9db@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116025229.29136-1-ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>

On 11/16/25 11:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>   6. Loop driver:
>    loop_queue_rq()
>     lo_rw_aio()
>      kmalloc_array(..., GFP_NOIO) <-- BLOCKS (REQ_NOWAIT violation)
>       -> Should use GFP_NOWAIT when rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT

Same comment as for zloop. Re-read the code and see that loop_queue_rq() calls
loop_queue_work(). That function has a memory allocation that is already marked
with GFP_NOWAIT, and that this function does not directly execute lo_rw_aio() as
that is done from loop_workfn(), in the work item context.
So again, no blocking violation that I can see here.
As far as I can tell, this patch is not needed.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-16  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-16  2:52 [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  2:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] zloop: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  3:44   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-16  3:50 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-11-16  5:43   ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  6:26     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-18  1:52       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-18  5:21     ` hch
2025-11-18 13:57       ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-19  0:39         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f76d0ec-a746-4eaf-abe9-86b51d2ff9db@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox