From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E56C3F6B0 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 05:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232158AbiHVFqZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 01:46:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41374 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229570AbiHVFqY (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 01:46:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C1B25C50; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id bh13so8488276pgb.4; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:46:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:from:to:cc; bh=EZ6zyXMtSXkd7oqpzJx7bOLc4ED/KqdW+vVISMpRooU=; b=W2ekLYjeaC0AdOY7oVmHoxhJC5RKuDplSYkW5fn2y34vBbnPp+2y0L41sCxpWz+D9F dr4iH+cL4uJhZsfqcXGjCigxWxbOsn8QHPVX+9RVV6pUZEYqKgjt+YcZ0swZLb8YtoTl s4rtGtwql7BvrevisvKwi9CRmosTY06ndLZlqv0EI6dgi83MNPNc181vqDX7qkNDOr00 tF4naQTIHFTlscEvvQUXnxIzPQcOihwqq3Ua2U7q3T6nt2YCN+acGIrdbk6mMMtw7bqc tYo+jn5gAiRPXHRvHg1MimKOwfTH60W8KorHVop+eTVwkO7N1sDGKfp+IN5PyC2sET5O bWNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc; bh=EZ6zyXMtSXkd7oqpzJx7bOLc4ED/KqdW+vVISMpRooU=; b=IeZdfd45KSd2aLgqb7jN3J66gImlsrwnbirN+H2TjXNMANZptrgP6sKbQv8at7GVof qloAFWc5ehlb/LvtHTve3bREQ/7g+9S5utBHqekFbah2E/m92A5sbDzTBDPgIKQMNhBD d5MtoP/x7KT3db+kinB+D4aBdYtQK6PFJ0PIW+2ZX4i3UEbRgNvs8ykRa61uJ2RB3oZD mbH6ci1hbLztbbThbme3Nk9vLJxE3kFvWMoPw8pvx56cOlUiapLl+X0orHb7KfSEgHcn C5YCiAfTuT5MsegUSjt22wNIS94HK5LmvFhDfmusSIdLMvaox00kGOEo5wW8AD67G8KU UQnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2oojpERSgJG2UEtJ278byAoGlzfrdOW1E2c5DsK6zqK6qYwp0k x/wzyUF/VSMdGEkk3mnxdBFEjxjCcHM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5CYnv3UjvCi7MnOQVLN5mLgu5J9hAjA6pupzSmcla0rvp2Gv7i5mFAfP+KlZAc11datac01Q== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6e49:0:b0:429:cae6:aac6 with SMTP id be9-20020a656e49000000b00429cae6aac6mr15398243pgb.268.1661147183217; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.24] (222-155-0-244-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz. [222.155.0.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z14-20020a170902d54e00b00172e6c66f84sm1797148plf.148.2022.08.21.22.46.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Aug 2022 22:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] block: add overflow checks for Amiga partition support To: Martin Steigerwald , Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <1539570747-19906-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <71d9f2fe-42d1-2a09-a860-702b42a3a733@kernel.dk> <0bf2e4f9-a1c1-3847-a2b5-d9b9eaaa783a@gmail.com> <2669426.mvXUDI8C0e@lichtvoll.de> Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, Christoph Hellwig From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <6fa2c159-e7c7-2d2c-04b5-54c2b2c9a24e@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:46:17 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux ppc; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2669426.mvXUDI8C0e@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Martin, Am 22.08.2022 um 08:59 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Michael Schmitz - 26.07.22, 05:58:40 CEST: >> Am 26.07.2022 um 15:40 schrieb Jens Axboe: >>> On 7/25/22 7:53 PM, Michael Schmitz wrote: >>>> Hi Jens, >>>> >>>> there's been quite a bit of review on this patch series back in the >>>> day (most of that would have been on linux-m68k IIRC; see Geert's >>>> Reviewed-By tag), and I addressed the issues raised but as you say, >>>> it did never get merged. >>>> >>>> I've found a copy of the linux-block repo that has these patches, >>>> will see if I can get them updated to apply to current >>>> linux-block.> >>> Thanks, please do resend them and we can get them applied. >> >> Will do - running final compile tests. > > Just reminding. Did this go in meanwhile? Not yet, at last count. Christoph had reviewed v8 and I've addressed his comments in v9. Should have added his Reviewed-by tag for both patches perhaps, not just patch 1. Shall I resend v9 with that omission rectified, Jens? Cheers, Michael > > Thanks, >