From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2] nvme/068: add a test for multipath delayed removal
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:06:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7009b70f-bc19-4034-9426-2b94522afcbd@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417094854.2135472-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On 4/17/26 3:18 PM, John Garry wrote:
> For NVMe multipath, the delayed removal feature allows the multipath
> gendisk to remain present when all available paths are gone. The purpose of
> this feature is to ensure that we keep the gendisk for intermittent path
> failures.
>
> The delayed removal works on a timer - when all paths are gone, a timer is
> kicked off; once the timer expires and no paths have returned, the gendisk
> is removed.
>
> When all paths are gone and the gendisk is still present, all reads and
> writes to the disk are queued. If a path returns before the timer
> expiration, the timer canceled and the queued IO is submitted;
> otherwise they fail when the timer expires.
>
> This testcase covers two scenarios in separate parts:
> a. test that IOs submitted after all paths are removed (and do not return)
> fail
> b. test that IOs submitted between all paths removed and a path
> returning succeed
>
> During the period of the timer being active, it must be ensured that the
> nvme-core module is not removed. Otherwise the driver may not be present
> to handle the timeout expiry. The kernel ensures this by taking a
> reference to the module. Ideally, we would try to remove the module during
> this test to prove that this is not possible (and the kernel behaves as
> expected), but that module will probably not be removable anyway due to
> many references. To test this feature, check that the refcount of the
> nvme-core module is incremented when the delayed timer is active.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 9:48 [PATCH blktests v2] nvme/068: add a test for multipath delayed removal John Garry
2026-04-17 12:36 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7009b70f-bc19-4034-9426-2b94522afcbd@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox