public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] scsi: set timed out out mq requests to complete
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:56:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70619fc4-3b98-4213-0d4e-aa7aa248f88d@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180725011543.GA14596@localhost.localdomain>

On 2018-07-24 09:15 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:46:17PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 07/23/18 07:37, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> +		if (req->q->mq_ops && !blk_mq_mark_complete(req))
>>> +			return rtn;
>>>    		if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) {
>>>    			set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
>>>    			scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd);
>>
>> This change looks incomplete to me. I think the following scenario is not
>> handled properly by the above patch:
>> - host->hostt->eh_timed_out() gets called.
>> - The request "req" completes from another context while
>>    host->hostt->eh_timed_out() is in progress.
>> - host->hostt->eh_timed_out() calls scsi_finish_command().
>>
>> I think that scenario will lead to a double completion.
> 
> A bit of a moot point, isn't it? Not a single scsi lld directly calls
> scsi_finish_command() from anywhere, much less through eh_timed_out().

" * scsi_finish_command - cleanup and pass command back to upper layer"

That is from the comment block above the definition of scsi_finish_command().
To me that means the mid-level has already got the response from the LLD
(directly via a queuecommand() return, or asynchronously via the scsi_done()
callback) and this function will call the "upper layer" which will be
the one of the sd, sr, st, sg, ses, etc drivers that originated the command
for that UL-driver's completion.

In USB Type C speak, the SCSI mid level has two interfaces, one downward
facing (toward LLDs) and one upward facing (toward the drivers listed above).
No LLD should be calling scsi_finish_command() IMO.

Doug Gilbert

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-25  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-23 14:37 [PATCHv2 1/2] blk-mq: export setting request completion state Keith Busch
2018-07-23 14:37 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] scsi: set timed out out mq requests to complete Keith Busch
2018-07-24  7:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-24 22:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-25  1:15     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-25  1:56       ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2018-07-25  2:48         ` Keith Busch
2018-07-25 15:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-25 16:48     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-24  7:56 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] blk-mq: export setting request completion state Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-24 20:42 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70619fc4-3b98-4213-0d4e-aa7aa248f88d@interlog.com \
    --to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox