From: "chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <lkml@sdf.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: The irq Affinity is changed after the patch(Fixes: b1a5a73e64e9 ("genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio"))
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:32:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75a630b2-029b-0a3e-79a9-d11143a033ad@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119031700.GE391@ming.t460p>
在 2019/11/19 11:17, Ming Lei 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:05:55AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote:
>> Hi Ming,
>>
>> 在 2019/11/19 9:42, Ming Lei 写道:
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:25:30AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There are 128 cpus and 16 irqs for SAS controller in my system, and there
>>>> are 4 Nodes, every 32 cpus are for one node (cpu0-31 for node0, cpu32-63 for
>>>> node1, cpu64-95 for node2, cpu96-127 for node3).
>>>> We use function pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() to set the affinity of
>>>> irqs.
>>>>
>>>> I find that before the patch (Fixes: b1a5a73e64e9 ("genirq/affinity: Spread
>>>> vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio")), the relationship between irqs
>>>> and cpus is: irq0 bind to cpu0-7, irq1 bind to cpu8-15,
>>>> irq2 bind to cpu16-23, irq3 bind to cpu24-31,irq4 bind to cpu32-39... irq15
>>>> bind to cpu120-127. But after the patch, the relationship is changed: irq0
>>>> bind to cpu32-39,
>>>> irq1 bind to cpu40-47, ..., irq11 bind to cpu120-127, irq12 bind to cpu0-7,
>>>> irq13 bind to cpu8-15, irq14 bind to cpu16-23, irq15 bind to cpu24-31.
>>>>
>>>> I notice that before calling the sort() in function alloc_nodes_vectors(),
>>>> the id of array node_vectors[] is from 0,1,2,3. But after function sort(),
>>>> the index of array node_vectors[] is 1,2,3,0.
>>>> But i think it sorts according to the numbers of cpus in those nodes, so it
>>>> should be the same as before calling sort() as the numbers of cpus in every
>>>> node are 32.
>>> Maybe there are more non-present CPUs covered by node 0.
>>>
>>> Could you provide the following log?
>>>
>>> 1) lscpu
>>>
>>> 2) ./dump-io-irq-affinity $PCI_ID_SAS
>>>
>>> http://people.redhat.com/minlei/tests/tools/dump-io-irq-affinity
>>>
>>> You need to figure out the PCI ID(the 1st column of lspci output) of the SAS
>>> controller via lspci.
>> Sorry, I can't access the link you provide, but i can provide those irqs'
>> affinity in the attachment.
>> I also write a small testcase, and find id is 1, 2, 3, 0 after calling
>> sort() .
> Runtime log from /proc/interrupts isn't useful for investigating
> affinity allocation issue, please use the attached script for collecting
> log.
Note: there are 32 irqs for SAS controller, irq0-15 are other interrupts
(such as phy up/down/channel....), only irq 16-31 are cq interrupts
which is processed by function pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity().
The log is as follows:
Euler:~ # ./dump-io-irq-affinity 74:02.0
kernel version:
Linux Euler 5.4.0-rc2-14683-g74684b1-dirty #224 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 18
18:54:27 CST 2019 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
PCI name is 74:02.0: sdd
cat: /proc/irq/65/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/65/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 65, cpu list , effective list
irq 66, cpu list 0-31, effective list 0
irq 67, cpu list 0-31, effective list 0
cat: /proc/irq/68/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/68/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 68, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/69/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/69/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 69, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/70/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/70/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 70, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/71/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/71/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 71, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/72/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/72/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 72, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/73/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/73/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 73, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/74/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/74/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 74, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/75/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/75/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 75, cpu list , effective list
irq 76, cpu list 0-31, effective list 0
cat: /proc/irq/77/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/77/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 77, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/78/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/78/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 78, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/79/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/79/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 79, cpu list , effective list
cat: /proc/irq/80/smp_affinity_list: No such file or directory
cat: /proc/irq/80/effective_affinity_list: No such file or directory
irq 80, cpu list , effective list
irq 81, cpu list 32-39, effective list 32
irq 82, cpu list 40-47, effective list 40
irq 83, cpu list 48-55, effective list 48
irq 84, cpu list 56-63, effective list 56
irq 85, cpu list 64-71, effective list 64
irq 86, cpu list 72-79, effective list 72
irq 87, cpu list 80-87, effective list 80
irq 88, cpu list 88-95, effective list 88
irq 89, cpu list 96-103, effective list 96
irq 90, cpu list 104-111, effective list 104
irq 91, cpu list 112-119, effective list 112
irq 92, cpu list 120-127, effective list 120
irq 93, cpu list 0-7, effective list 0
irq 94, cpu list 8-15, effective list 8
irq 95, cpu list 16-23, effective list 16
irq 96, cpu list 24-31, effective list 24
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 1:25 The irq Affinity is changed after the patch(Fixes: b1a5a73e64e9 ("genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio")) chenxiang (M)
2019-11-19 1:42 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <a8a89884-8323-ff70-f35e-0fcf5d7afefc@hisilicon.com>
2019-11-19 3:17 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-19 3:32 ` chenxiang (M) [this message]
2019-11-19 6:56 ` Ming Lei
2019-12-08 7:42 ` George Spelvin
2019-12-09 2:58 ` chenxiang (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75a630b2-029b-0a3e-79a9-d11143a033ad@hisilicon.com \
--to=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lkml@sdf.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox