From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
mkoutny@suse.com, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] blk-cgroup: Flush stats before releasing blkcg_gq
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:43:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76a863b4-112e-82ae-59e4-6326fff48ffc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZG2R+jYuAZMpx49d@ovpn-8-17.pek2.redhat.com>
On 5/24/23 00:26, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:19:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 5/23/23 23:51, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> As noted by Michal, the blkg_iostat_set's in the lockless list hold
>>> reference to blkg's to protect against their removal. Those blkg's
>>> hold reference to blkcg. When a cgroup is being destroyed,
>>> cgroup_rstat_flush() is only called at css_release_work_fn() which
>>> is called when the blkcg reference count reaches 0. This circular
>>> dependency will prevent blkcg and some blkgs from being freed after
>>> they are made offline.
>>>
>>> It is less a problem if the cgroup to be destroyed also has other
>>> controllers like memory that will call cgroup_rstat_flush() which will
>>> clean up the reference count. If block is the only controller that uses
>>> rstat, these offline blkcg and blkgs may never be freed leaking more
>>> and more memory over time.
>>>
>>> To prevent this potential memory leak:
>>>
>>> - flush blkcg per-cpu stats list in __blkg_release(), when no new stat
>>> can be added
>>>
>>> - don't grab bio->bi_blkg reference when adding the stats into blkcg's
>>> per-cpu stat list since all stats are guaranteed to be consumed before
>>> releasing blkg instance, and grabbing blkg reference for stats was the
>>> most fragile part of original patch
>>>
>>> Based on Waiman's patch:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221215033132.230023-3-longman@redhat.com/
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3b8cc6298724 ("blk-cgroup: Optimize blkcg_rstat_flush()")
>>> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: mkoutny@suse.com
>>> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> V2:
>>> - remove kernel/cgroup change, and call blkcg_rstat_flush()
>>> to flush stat directly
>>>
>>> block/blk-cgroup.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>>> index 0ce64dd73cfe..ed0eb8896972 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>>> #include "blk-ioprio.h"
>>> #include "blk-throttle.h"
>>> +static void __blkcg_rstat_flush(struct blkcg *blkcg, int cpu);
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * blkcg_pol_mutex protects blkcg_policy[] and policy [de]activation.
>>> * blkcg_pol_register_mutex nests outside of it and synchronizes entire
>>> @@ -163,10 +165,21 @@ static void blkg_free(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
>>> static void __blkg_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>>> {
>>> struct blkcg_gq *blkg = container_of(rcu, struct blkcg_gq, rcu_head);
>>> + struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
>>> + int cpu;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_PUNT_BIO
>>> WARN_ON(!bio_list_empty(&blkg->async_bios));
>>> #endif
>>> + /*
>>> + * Flush all the non-empty percpu lockless lists before releasing
>>> + * us, given these stat belongs to us.
>>> + *
>>> + * cgroup locks aren't needed here since __blkcg_rstat_flush just
>>> + * propagates delta into blkg parent, which is live now.
>>> + */
>>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>>> + __blkcg_rstat_flush(blkcg, cpu);
>>> /* release the blkcg and parent blkg refs this blkg has been holding */
>>> css_put(&blkg->blkcg->css);
>>> @@ -951,17 +964,12 @@ static void blkcg_iostat_update(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, struct blkg_iostat *cur,
>>> u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&blkg->iostat.sync, flags);
>>> }
>>> -static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
>>> +static void __blkcg_rstat_flush(struct blkcg *blkcg, int cpu)
>>> {
>>> - struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(css);
>>> struct llist_head *lhead = per_cpu_ptr(blkcg->lhead, cpu);
>>> struct llist_node *lnode;
>>> struct blkg_iostat_set *bisc, *next_bisc;
>>> - /* Root-level stats are sourced from system-wide IO stats */
>>> - if (!cgroup_parent(css->cgroup))
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>> lnode = llist_del_all(lhead);
>>> @@ -991,13 +999,19 @@ static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
>>> if (parent && parent->parent)
>>> blkcg_iostat_update(parent, &blkg->iostat.cur,
>>> &blkg->iostat.last);
>>> - percpu_ref_put(&blkg->refcnt);
>>> }
>>> out:
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>> }
>>> +static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Root-level stats are sourced from system-wide IO stats */
>>> + if (cgroup_parent(css->cgroup))
>>> + __blkcg_rstat_flush(css_to_blkcg(css), cpu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>> I think it may not safe to call __blkcg_rstat_flus() directly without taking
>> the cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock. That is why I added a helper to
>> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c in my patch to meet the locking requirement.
> All stats are removed from llist_del_all(), and the local list is
> iterated, then each blkg & its parent is touched in __blkcg_rstat_flus(), so
> can you explain it a bit why cgroup locks are needed? For protecting
> what?
You are right. The llist_del_all() call in blkcg_rstat_flush() is
atomic, so it is safe for concurrent execution which is what the
cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock protects against. That may not be the case for
rstat callbacks of other controllers. So I will suggest you to add a
comment to clarify that point. Other than that, you patch looks good to me.
Reviewed: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-24 3:51 [PATCH V2] blk-cgroup: Flush stats before releasing blkcg_gq Ming Lei
2023-05-24 4:19 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-24 4:26 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-24 15:43 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-05-24 17:28 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-25 2:04 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-25 2:50 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-25 2:55 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-25 3:04 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-25 3:08 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-25 3:11 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-25 3:23 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-25 3:47 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-25 4:02 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-25 4:05 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76a863b4-112e-82ae-59e4-6326fff48ffc@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox