From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net (011.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BBD3563297; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183698; cv=none; b=ukNgJe8jIWdF6iWa1aCMqbOMBHGtAAk4ijtT99UVZAKN241dlYLtk9N1ZVAPaYZHm3m3aIMl1u5fpKt0Y0bgF2XUEv9nSUaEzVIFkchq8CgPbxUJQcn4bZkFP74tnrKa4uvUxHmPQbyXjRC2DkXSt4P/hthrJHX+yPq3IT++iPY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cnvV5g1t5WP4Kco1Qsd1kwvD910KxUaz342uhKlnXSg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=aVCv6XUN5vcxwySGndLH5AVpiLQteVrwEqhRM5nF8H5llEcvO1gbdyy0iB4dG63p/H/zRXF5OG3osaUCx97VRWo2/eEtMU6lOy3JzZOq0ld7nU+f9ONIsZitA5EzcbllJssBd5J+DzWsmVY1RwOFgx1Foz90IA2iA013BC1VYxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=MyhaD8It; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="MyhaD8It" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hqk9V0p5Sz1XM5kW; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1790183686; x=1792775687; bh=3qc10G2922bb0dMkJC+jOzuq NnwQUytYMJrgHXQPaSo=; b=MyhaD8ItxJdFKD+bVsmlY16Ckg5yuL87i/auKX5i dxsgSErtsyFaz8V8yH8Y+l6DWBCtX74RtphZOK9cVCiDcXCEG0MHFySMIUp1jqT4 ZF3UYvEqsmPvHCQLL1Vb7rYvxIOVl4M8D52GWc16eclXm0WDyoKePLdj6zhKvzj5 shz2ude+W4ZrIIP61FX7hpirmdFbkZJCD/jJ50RAWPwZPYDyqYUAVyCmboJL1E4c LN2oJ5OkGZAId+M3dnbiebGpQfpcZRW7A8qyKrk36JMHfoi4dopDQ8bcxnozl//0 exkO0ZfGjTTmoQvhXOl3M0bjdVJwJpaL+1Cfnl3eCG5f5Q== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (011.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id x4e-pVLKkSLa; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.80.231.125] (unknown [104.135.182.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4hqk9F5Yglz1XM4Sx; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <7805a9a4-a4ed-49d6-a645-00de0823fc76@acm.org> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:14:40 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] block: Add post_release() operation To: Tetsuo Handa , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , linux-block Cc: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Brian Foster , Damien Le Moal , Hillf Danton , Markus Elfring , Ming Lei , Qu Wenruo , Tao Cui , kernel test robot , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Nilay Shroff References: <69960302-1535-441a-be4e-d652766d65c2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <69960302-1535-441a-be4e-d652766d65c2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/22/26 10:09 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Changes in v5: > Since Bart Van Assche commented that post_release() is more clear > and more descriptive than run_todo(), renamed run_todo() back to > post_release(), and make it be called only if release() was called. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche