From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99FA1632D7; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749655512; cv=none; b=tl9/qmmYjt7sx2W4JydmwPsWqS/iIkjI7sw/gTgExWvQUCYVYcYVdLv5B4CmNAHjJiQXJbvYdJqNiErveoDTrE5l3fw8fkWzegHhHNBjslQUBEcP8RY0cgg1VA8jox7bdxYfdrhaGfXp++OHebOHi2pPbzwWUP4C4vEe5wFj2hE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749655512; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o/kCCEam7x/8zUbez+utqgmB4o0YyAg/VynA3QdbuUk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Aldk+SaHypSJuBD9gWKhwb9asiAKEI/f/fsAxbDT3sHFFV5LBdjYLnz+t5kaeO8SZf93QagDAZt3NzgZvbOVxE2fmjg6BQNqVYOrd72i2AiY+K/AK796xOYW96vOMNcWFnfnW/fUbAAi6HvyC7D5Eg+UZmFnxPmE+8sQnMrXsbc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=jLvq96ou; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="jLvq96ou" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bHTxD0shbzlgqVW; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:25:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1749655500; x=1752247501; bh=o/kCCEam7x/8zUbez+utqgmB 4o0YyAg/VynA3QdbuUk=; b=jLvq96ouC1EYZUeID7YXt/1M0bRSdf8h86uWKZ15 XLti0O5Fi53JDfmOUKcG0jpc5nKew3nwtrGwMuQZolHZkXs6c/XuC/8YwyedvObZ rKLY/4gXm47PKauc+uXhsGCwOuMNz/170pJ6OM8I84plJujAeYmsjgNcWU0MZc4i 5zaIuuBTYbmuihbtMv+BA5Hs3TyJ5G1mh3A10pCBeXZ7MFjehJlWKGc0FxCLUK75 uvEpjEyZeNZPgFLkVHHSbkxFBDHRmubEG+mOYjAeZAS/oP8qfhfE57CMaE/MVxPq FOvF86oNvMS03kM3Teuk/6CeJiVNFxN+injUXQAsLedjmw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 4NXAhfY5d2U5; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bHTwv59NczlgqVK; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <79d40bb9-ec40-415d-80eb-4ae8ab150737@acm.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:24:45 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "block: don't reorder requests in blk_add_rq_to_plug" To: Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , Hagar Hemdan , Shaoying Xu , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Hajnoczi , =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=C3=A9rez?= , Xuan Zhuo , Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org References: <20250611121626.7252-1-abuehaze@amazon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20250611121626.7252-1-abuehaze@amazon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/11/25 5:14 AM, Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh wrote: > Given that moving plug list to a single linked list was mainly for > performance reason then let's revert commit ("block: don't > reorder requests in blk_add_rq_to_plug") for now to mitigate the > reported performance regression. Reverting that commit would break zoned storage support and hence is not an option. Bart.