From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:33:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bf0c159-b93b-4892-97fb-16b55f236e53@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604105347.168322-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
On 2026/06/04 18:53, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
> the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
> alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.
>
> With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
> any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
> must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.
>
> In order to keep alloc_workqueue() behavior identical, explicitly request
> WQ_PERCPU.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 10:53 [PATCH] block: Add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2026-06-05 6:33 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-06-05 6:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-06-05 17:15 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2026-06-05 17:21 ` Jens Axboe
2026-06-07 18:50 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bf0c159-b93b-4892-97fb-16b55f236e53@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox