From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267FFC43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1CB206E6 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="xY2+Eoje" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727143AbgC0Tji (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:39:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:42144 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726738AbgC0Tji (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:39:38 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id e1so3813716plt.9 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:39:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bYBzIMLidsbtn936Tkn2JZUpNIG8j99wkhdl9NhOeM=; b=xY2+Eoje7gw1gG5hGk9AkOQtnnY3k/MKnXHc6J5K6ahYMnz24p3JSYorv+TmXUCn6t jtSTGzgYBBj4XvQdLMm21Ob68hv140a1FUlPHjKUNGsG7oLFZv9em3co6lb2IYztCLGf 4BvTrL6T6EPjY+VQTLExjYsakaqdIvYjz43EI5UpijsxFTEwbKUTRww4K+VJcq6y6/zq aI/humarfNwtN5pj8WAajyQFCIHlf/I9DpIpzPwpxxHomu7yY91zFH7oEM8+MqftIHGg VoNtQRstAhzX+xdiDB+nNFlzQchrUzrAC10QH66OTr/rkCVAEU4JonbxoD3i6+ir84sj J0ow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bYBzIMLidsbtn936Tkn2JZUpNIG8j99wkhdl9NhOeM=; b=R+Nc5mqzrgnyH6PF3CB+peOV70t/baYh8qXHwH2Gk1nXfR42WXi37zEh19pLgJPjpL vdPVzc+/eqRgpsVEwlNDDa3Mi+0YHbdJyuBzBcGqcE4yhFOnWtXN7GvKOji/a5lan7HY tmne7/bzcN4W/+Imwfj2WrCGNw+/unusa4q32+ededR43ISJxv108snDy5uHJVdGiIor pYH1+9rwEzwiw8DOmc2KF4UN6q7uUFxsWNS4zEmBQ6Paq11Dk/fW6CxFB3vdTNvhP+CC l11yCskxCXWWP7lDuHJxt1FQndRC/BOcw2zKAMwe1u5r0uFZY1M+yf26Mi3ikLrFwtiB EovA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2TRGpha0jZlIbn92spZpV6eOyh7E4uVWAbHdiiFIzL8Yf+476/ SupdpjTbDP76Ckf/RscP8ai84VartLxceA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt9BQVoxYP52tQ97iqIZHYm2D+ifrPLeLEz4Y8du2EvSvCGOqhJP1qw9sNzHsg7aXGwKY2CAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:864c:: with SMTP id y12mr662411plt.8.1585337975542; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.188] ([66.219.217.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm4256926pjs.21.2020.03.27.12.39.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] null_blk: add tracepoints for zoned mode To: Chaitanya Kulkarni Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Damien Le Moal References: <20200325021629.15103-1-chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> <093c4ab1-924f-b109-31a8-ce5813f52e14@kernel.dk> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <7ec7a6e6-01f9-8ff9-b1fb-9766b60ab979@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:39:32 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 3/27/20 1:35 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 3/27/20 8:35 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/26/20 9:12 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> Can we get this in ? >> There still seems to be the unresolved issue of the function >> declaration. I agree that we should not have a declaration for >> a function if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED isn't set, so move it under >> the existing ifdef. >> > Sorry for replying to previous series. > > Here is link for V4 which has above fix and Damien's review :- > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg51305.html Applied, thanks. -- Jens Axboe