From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luca Mariotti" <mariottiluca1@hotmail.it>,
"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>,
"Pietro Pedroni" <pedroni.pietro.96@gmail.com>,
"Piotr Gorski" <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>,
"Khazhy Kumykov" <khazhy@google.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:35:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8003699.Qy64SzLKsf@spock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2CDC43F9-9CD9-4F7F-BD36-CCEB168B5245@linaro.org>
Hello.
On úterý 22. června 2021 9:08:43 CEST Paolo Valente wrote:
> CCing also Jan and Khazhy, because in your commit log I see also the
> commit on bfq_requests_merged().
>
> Is this OOPS reproducible for you?
No, I haven't found a reproducer, at least yet. It took half a day of uptime
to hit this, so might not be that easy.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-19 14:09 [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 1/7] block, bfq: let also stably merged queues enjoy weight raising Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 2/7] block, bfq: fix delayed stable merge check Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 3/7] block, bfq: consider also creation time in delayed stable merge Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 4/7] block, bfq: boost throughput by extending queue-merging times Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 5/7] block, bfq: avoid delayed merge of async queues Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 6/7] block, bfq: check waker only for queues with no in-flight I/O Paolo Valente
2021-06-19 14:09 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 7/7] block, bfq: reset waker pointer with shared queues Paolo Valente
2021-06-21 16:08 ` [PATCH FIXES/IMPROVEMENTS 0/7] block, bfq: preserve control, boost throughput, fix bugs Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 19:55 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-06-21 20:03 ` Piotr Górski
2021-06-22 7:08 ` Paolo Valente
2021-06-22 7:35 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2021-06-22 16:29 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-22 17:26 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-07-02 22:07 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-08-02 20:40 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-08-03 10:45 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8003699.Qy64SzLKsf@spock \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com \
--cc=mariottiluca1@hotmail.it \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=pedroni.pietro.96@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox