From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.18/block 06/10] blk-mq: split bitmap grow and resize case in blk_mq_update_nr_requests()
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:48:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85259339-d832-468a-a9b0-0c326c896370@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250908061533.3062917-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/8/25 11:45 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> No functional changes are intended, make code cleaner and prepare to fix
> the grow case in following patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 1ff6370f7314..82fa81036115 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -4931,21 +4931,25 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
> blk_mq_tag_update_sched_shared_tags(q);
> else
> blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_tags(set, nr);
> - } else {
> + } else if (!q->elevator) {
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> if (!hctx->tags)
> continue;
> - /*
> - * If we're using an MQ scheduler, just update the
> - * scheduler queue depth. This is similar to what the
> - * old code would do.
> - */
> - if (hctx->sched_tags)
> - ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx,
> - &hctx->sched_tags, nr);
> - else
> - ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx,
> - &hctx->tags, nr);
> + sbitmap_queue_resize(&hctx->tags->bitmap_tags,
> + nr - hctx->tags->nr_reserved_tags);
> + }
> + } else if (nr <= q->elevator->et->nr_requests) {
> + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> + if (!hctx->sched_tags)
> + continue;
> + sbitmap_queue_resize(&hctx->sched_tags->bitmap_tags,
> + nr - hctx->sched_tags->nr_reserved_tags);
> + }
> + } else {
> + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> + if (!hctx->sched_tags)
> + continue;
> + blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->sched_tags, nr);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
The above code is good however can this be bit simplified?
It's a bit difficult to follow through all nesting and so
could it be simplified as below:
if (shared-tags) {
if (elevator)
// resize sched-shared-tags bitmap
else
// resize shared-tags bitmap
} else {
// non-shared tags
if (elevator) {
if (new-depth-is-less-than-the-current-depth)
// resize sched-tags bitmap
else
// handle sched tags grow
} else
// resize tags bitmap
}
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 6:15 [PATCH for-6.18/block 00/10] cleanup and fixes for updating nr_requests Yu Kuai
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 01/10] blk-mq: remove useless checking in queue_requests_store() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 11:34 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 02/10] blk-mq: remove useless checkings in blk_mq_update_nr_requests() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 11:35 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 03/10] blk-mq: check invalid nr_requests in queue_requests_store() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 11:36 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 04/10] blk-mq: convert to serialize updating nr_requests with update_nr_hwq_lock Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 6:29 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 6:38 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 6:52 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 7:16 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 9:26 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 9:36 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 10:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 10:42 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 11:32 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 11:40 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 05/10] blk-mq: cleanup shared tags case in blk_mq_update_nr_requests() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 11:58 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 06/10] blk-mq: split bitmap grow and resize " Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 12:18 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-09-09 16:39 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-10 6:30 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-10 6:42 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 07/10] blk-mq-sched: add new parameter nr_requests in blk_mq_alloc_sched_tags() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 12:19 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 08/10] blk-mq: fix potential deadlock while nr_requests grown Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 6:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 7:37 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 9:36 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-09 12:21 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-10 7:46 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 09/10] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_tag_update_depth() Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 12:35 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-08 6:15 ` [PATCH for-6.18/block 10/10] blk-mq: fix stale nr_requests documentation Yu Kuai
2025-09-09 12:35 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85259339-d832-468a-a9b0-0c326c896370@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox