From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 04/17] blk-mq: don't reserve tags for admin queue To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Alan Stern , Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche , Hannes Reinecke , Johannes Thumshirn , Adrian Hunter , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org References: <20180811071220.357-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180811071220.357-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> <14c6e892-b05f-7422-0fd3-da45a645d3ba@oracle.com> <20180813104822.GA18557@ming.t460p> From: "jianchao.wang" Message-ID: <85e5fb60-fdf1-436e-8bc1-5480d5b2b17f@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:29:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180813104822.GA18557@ming.t460p> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: Hi Ming On 08/13/2018 06:48 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > It is nothing to do with where the admin request is sent, so no any > difference wrt. this issue between with and without this patchset, > right? I'm afraid not. For example: A scsi host has 8 LUNs associated with it. Before this patch set, When we send out the admin command, the budget is _per_ LUN, 1/8 of the total tags. After this patch set, When we send out the admin command, the budget is equal to _one_ LUN, 1/8 of the total tags. However, the 1/8 above is different. Before the patch set, every LUN's admin command has 1/8 budget to use which is per LUN. After this patch set, all the 8 LUNs admin command has to share the 1/8 budget. Thanks Jianchao