From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block changes for 4.18-rc
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 07:16:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efhmp7zw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52aaf207-ef5d-a886-66fe-566de9d9bbee@kernel.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3067 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 04 2018, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/4/18 9:51 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:42 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> drivers/md/md.c | 61 +--
>>> drivers/md/md.h | 4 +-
>>
>> So I've pulled this, but I get a new warning:
>>
>> drivers/md/md.c: In function ‘mddev_put’:
>> drivers/md/md.c:543:1: warning: the frame size of 2112 bytes is
>> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>>
>> which seems to be due to commit afeee514ce7f ("md: convert to
>> bioset_init()/mempool_init()").
>>
>> As of that commit, mddev_put() now allocates *two* "struct bio_set"
>> structures on the stack, and those really aren't small. Yes, part of
>> it is that I do my test-builds with all that debug stuff, but those
>> structures have several embedded mempool_t members, and they really
>> are pretty sizable.
>>
>> And I _really_ do not think it's acceptable to have that kind of stack
>> usage in there. I'm not sure you can trigger mddev_put() in the IO
>> paths, but even without that I don't think it's acceptable.
>>
>> Also, the code simply looks like complete and utter garbage. It does
>>
>> bs = mddev->bio_set;
>> sync_bs = mddev->sync_set;
>>
>> to _copy_ those structures, and then does bioset_exit() on them. WTF?
>>
>> Why the hell doesn't it just do biset_exit() on the originals instead,
>> before freeing the mddev?
>>
>> I've pulled this, but this needs to be fixed. That is just broken
>> garbage right now. No way in hell is it acceptable to waste 2kB of
>> stack space on something idiotic like this.
>
> Works is already underway to get this fixed up. I agree that the
> excessive stack usage isn't great, but the code in that function
> is pretty miserable, as you say. That's not new with the patch,
> the conversion just carried that forward.
>
> CC'ing Neil to get his input on how best to clean that up, I'd
> be much more comfortable with that logic improved rather than
> just catering to the stack usage issue. Also include Arnd, as
> he had a test patch for it.
Cc:ing Shaohua as well, as he is the current maintainer, and authored
Commit: 7184ef8bab0c ("MD: fix sleep in atomic")
which seems most relevant.
The justification given in that patch is that bioset_free() will take a
mutex.
This must have been in destory_workqueue() when destroying
bs->rescue_workqueue.
md biosets don't have a work queue (BIOSET_NEED_RESCUER isn't set),
so these calls will no longer take a mutex. So this commit
can now be reverted. I think that will clean up this code suitably.
I really should get back to BIOSET_NEED_RESCUER and see if I can discard
it completely.
Kent - the only remaining user is bcache, and the main reason I haven't
removed it is that I cannot follow the code (or at least, I couldn't
last time I tried). Are you able to see if it is still needed?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 0:42 [GIT PULL] Block changes for 4.18-rc Jens Axboe
2018-06-04 15:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-04 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-04 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-04 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
2018-06-04 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-04 18:25 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-04 19:04 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-06-05 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-05 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-05 0:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-06-05 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-07 1:45 ` Jens Axboe
2018-06-04 21:16 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2018-06-04 21:21 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-06-04 22:52 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-05 0:34 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efhmp7zw.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox