From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106952F5463 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 05:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763013239; cv=none; b=JBeG4eZcDt7G3OmTdNtru2082BR2jn9hWynMwcpe/nIyDjgrdsOQLqexO3qEib/vWO334/JQxcFenuEI/RiSzFLTh2LbXTdf0LWcarxcbaCwmBJSTVI/ZyTIpVF26brI/9NVAcRKuiDmz0ciTSgWn1d/v6MUxMnejr+y6CMwUGk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763013239; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G5i5DL7xw9uVAkYcjg+MHuhn04UdAZgfzYJ3MKANfAw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:References; b=CasPIxGt0/jXFPHUqmxUENcuz0ViTmXuQoKjP5IsslV+3pbvK5CsM2Z9QJyZiEkRLTKIDobI9zFp9EUTXrdSdMp5fwNYyWpgsX27FxlLNQuhfNNA2pxhH6SvQCD5nuyROAqCDNjKr358ygQbR6Sbb09Efktlx4nUQfv4rZHhIdc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=R2VYgd/g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="R2VYgd/g" Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7aab061e7cbso432224b3a.1 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:53:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1763013237; x=1763618037; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=references:message-id:date:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2UyP0ogKxI9Y1Qsu6mcA+/ZagVf5oyFn5jJYg/5sVy4=; b=R2VYgd/gSHShdVYxRp1tmwr1qySTws7MYLV3MWarXUOXzL3OIEjH8caB0NQOWdPYZD rI3PEDELbZyWeK8hNOoaFsXuipZ7cUygFQhnburJc/0kXmYkgHkTGng8bR8SBHOCJj4E 53fFaNXd2UkmKbycleogi0lqdBIGUfboc0LRIWEsaZ9Oh0wvWlt8hscCEmIncrfv1W0c kZCvsqDmdF9hsYo9Ktk8Hrozc8ik0cPhfTAYrszTmXMWzfB+v9LtAeLW9mh5wbGMVKe+ RhWd8Gl2Gs+A3e0gB5cLb9fUP77n32C7fyxbKmkblnInmAdmF4ZwCtQs09PbiAaYjm/G KNFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763013237; x=1763618037; h=references:message-id:date:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2UyP0ogKxI9Y1Qsu6mcA+/ZagVf5oyFn5jJYg/5sVy4=; b=Z/JsZia6+1ofNztMDIT6Kwl8+09xiUpWGlsEagaq/KPKdj68iYdabwKTMdltXQrxjp i1QV/4X/JzXypFODQFsBINyni26oQ6+0J4yE61/xRw5+Sibqil7u26dVKEjvtWxOyQqa ef6+CAUHxvNXxV4nG/qPhGxilX5yI56CedZ7FNJSnxdct9aJy+BePvMLtLhOxa5+7H5P qHOHHgcdpDgWiD5FUnKih+ju7LqWN2zZP3uy1yw7fSpPcI/uhK1Df3TGrjgKadIxqDHz +U3k5ckkeeoARnW5xVV/aPJsrn8KvdndhlhwHrAV99SdkmAYeNOBLoa74vCdyBOf60Px KZ6g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXvFDaasgcM1OkTX7/Ym59aUuFW761zmNg8BMaHfIiyjMat5em1H5CPSHNMJEMfugGXG0WHUdgy+qTZRQ==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxyLkeOh8v7YBAwLZJfLcyvNp2sJhxcIWyX4ANK1ywIcCgFNVzW cYC1YkhZXAtspTzuW23q7h7mhZDkaYkiyx328/tpSv85dDu2sSpOt/A+ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu6eFhgC0zpIDbCbs2jy52+PVcTbFB9D5lalbAoUBXfLEkOAS2dz5u7FlTxLu0 jA7ad80W1uIA38mz3oxQ/C0Hkky4TdWpL9JODZrGMhQ9Yf41OPL1D66tOCMYE5nUeeW8M4iHNDZ SJmLDC4AswfBU+k6sSeB8nShuIQWtpCR+vZWTY6tiA/HHxXOFLrKfu1zJe++qmycXx1tuixDYM7 x8Rg6DnRIzfYnqifjGxQP5h4Cz2uoUl9ixI/I+jtEiJZbT/Q/S8qG5DZMVED2O8s8kKyCvWwoXD p38dX7wpTRul16qot9SKheNctTsNQn1fOzdA9MiU0RZQxcPwRdYhUjfera5pkiR270gdrUjrbGA 7vztgstQ0fyPCECAXbRgtieStQt5RC0FzrDAV52T10uXdn0E+qG0lIEIs8KfQzbZLZjpol3A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlsnZ0k8muJSrddDRx8GFRERSbeF4nDY6yspGg9WIg4wg50amrL5Z1QtXjRUhp3wNQXmZujQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3d89:b0:2ef:1d19:3d3 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-3590968f3ffmr7213716637.14.1763013237233; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dw-tp ([49.207.219.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-bc365da0191sm937384a12.0.2025.11.12.21.53.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:53:56 -0800 (PST) From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) To: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo , Christian Brauner , djwong@kernel.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jack@suse.cz, nilay@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] xfs: single block atomic writes for buffered IO In-Reply-To: <20251113052337.GA28533@lst.de> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:12:49 +0530 Message-ID: <87frai8p46.ritesh.list@gmail.com> References: <20251113052337.GA28533@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:56:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 04:36:03PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: >> > This patch adds support to perform single block RWF_ATOMIC writes for >> > iomap xfs buffered IO. This builds upon the inital RFC shared by John >> > Garry last year [1]. Most of the details are present in the respective >> > commit messages but I'd mention some of the design points below: >> >> What is the use case for this functionality? i.e. what is the >> reason for adding all this complexity? > > Seconded. The atomic code has a lot of complexity, and further mixing > it with buffered I/O makes this even worse. We'd need a really important > use case to even consider it. I agree this should have been in the cover letter itself. I believe the reason for adding this functionality was also discussed at LSFMM too... For e.g. https://lwn.net/Articles/974578/ goes in depth and talks about Postgres folks looking for this, since PostgreSQL databases uses buffered I/O for their database writes. -ritesh